| | IMPLICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION ON INDUSTRIAL |
| | 0,27 | | MB | INNOVATION: THE CASE OF END-OF-LIFE VEHICLES |
| | 63 | | stron |
| | 1833 | | ID | INSTITUTE FOR PROSPECTIVE TECHNOLOGICAL STUDIES |
| | 1999 | | rok |
| | Contents |
| | Executive summary5 |
| | 1. INTRODUCTION.8 |
| | 2. THE PROBLEM OF ELV.9 |
| | 2.1 GENERAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS .9 |
| | 2.2 INDUSTRIAL ASPECTS AND ACTORS’ STRATEGIES .13 |
| | 3. DEVELOPMENTS OF ELV POLICY IN EUROPE15 |
| | 3.1 NATIONAL-LEVEL DEVELOPMENTS.15 |
| | 3.2 EU-LEVEL DEVELOPMENTS 18 |
| | 4. TECHNICAL OPTIONS AND INDUSTRIAL EXPERIENCES IN MANAGING ELV21 |
| | 4.1 DIFFERENT TECHNICAL OPTIONS 21 |
| | 4.2 A SELECTION OF INTEGRATED APPROACHES AND INDUSTRIAL EXPERIENCES .29 |
| | 5. MAIN FEATURES OF THE INNOVATIVE PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF POLICIES.38 |
| | • POLICY EXPECTATIONS AND LEGISLATIVE THREATS HAD A LEADING ROLE IN INDUCING |
| | ELV MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCES 38 |
| | • TARGETS AND INSTRUMENTS SETTING ARE BASED ON STRATEGIES AND CONFIDENCE |
| | ON INNOVATION BUT ALSO ON DIVERGING VIEWS ON HOW TO TRIGGER THE LATTER .39 |
| | • EXPERIENCES ON ELV HIGHLIGHTS THE EVOLVING SEARCH OF THE “BEST APPROACH” |
| | AND SHIFTING FOCUS ON DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS NONE OF WHICH, HOWEVER, HAVE |
| | BEEN ABANDONED .40 |
| | • VARIETY OF EXPERIENCES REFLECTS DIFFERENT COMPANY CAPABILITIES AS WELL AS |
| | DIFFERENT NATIONAL CONTEXTS 42 |
| | • “COOPERATIVE COMPETITION” BETWEEN CAR PRODUCERS AND INSIDE ELV NETWORKS |
| | EMERGED AND CREATED EXTERNALITY EFFECTS 43 |
| | • NEW TYPES OF INDUSTRIAL INTEGRATION IN THE AUTOMOBILE SYSTEM AROSE WHICH |
| | STIMULATE THE PROBLEM OF THE CONTROL 43 |
| | • THE DISMANTLING INDUSTRY HAS A PIVOTAL ROLE FOR THE ECONOMIC IMPLICATION OF |
| | ELV AND THUS FOR THE POLICY-INDUCED INNOVATION MECHANISM44 |
| | • THE TRAJECTORY OF MATERIALS IN THE CAR INDUSTRY IS LIKELY TO BE AFFECTED BY |
| | ELV DEVELOPMENTS, ESPECIALLY WHEN DESIGN ADAPTATIONS ARE CONSIDERED. THE |
| | RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE CAR INDUSTRY AND THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY ARE THE |
| | MOST SIGNIFICANT IN THE PROCESS. 46 |
| | • RECYCLABILITY REQUISITES AND CORRESPONDING DESIGN ADAPTATIONS CAN CREATE |
| | SOME TECHNOLOGICAL TRADE-OFFS WITH OTHER TECHNOLOGICAL TRAJECTORIES OF |
| | THE CAR INDUSTRY 48 |
| | • THE COHERENCE OF ELV POLICIES IN TERMS OF HARMONISATION AT THE |
| | INTERNATIONAL LEVEL CAN BE QUESTIONED ON VARIOUS GROUNDS50 |
| | 6. EMERGING LINKS BETWEEN REGULATION AND INNOVATION52 |
| | 7. REFERENCES .59 |
| | 8. LIST OF INTERVIEWS62 |