| | Physical impacts of land use in product life cycle assessment |
| | 0,44 | | MB |
| | 52 | | stron |
| | 1942 | | ID | Technical University of Denmark |
| | 2002 | | rok |
| | Table of Contents |
| | INTRODUCTION. 4 |
| | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 5 |
| | 1. CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS. 6 |
| | 1.1 LAND USE AND PHYSICAL IMPACTS 6 |
| | 1.2 WHAT IS NOT INCLUDED HERE (RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER IMPACT CATEGORIES) 7 |
| | 1.3 IMPACT CHAIN. 8 |
| | 1.3.1 The starting point: Boundary between inventory analysis and impact assessment 8 |
| | 1.3.2 The end points: Areas of protection 9 |
| | 1.3.3 Mid-points of the impact chain . 11 |
| | 1.4 OCCUPATION AND TRANSFORMATION OF LAND 13 |
| | 1.5 CHOICE OF REFERENCE STATE FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF OCCUPATION IMPACTS. 15 |
| | |
| | 1.6 CHANGES IN THE RATE OF RELAXATION. 18 |
| | 2. INDICATORS FOR MEASURING NATURE VALUE. 19 |
| | 2.1 SUBSTANCE AND ENERGY CYCLES 19 |
| | 2.2 ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTIVITY . 21 |
| | 2.3 BIODIVERSITY . 22 |
| | 2.3.1 Species richness (SR) 24 |
| | 2.3.2 Inherent ecosystem scarcity (ES) 25 |
| | 2.3.3 Ecosystem vulnerability (EV) . 26 |
| | 2.3.4 Combining the biodiversity factors. 28 |
| | 2.4 CULTURAL VALUE. 29 |
| | 2.5 MIGRATION AND DISPERSAL 30 |
| | 3. DATA AND MAPS. 31 |
| | 3.1 DATA FOR SUBSTANCE AND ENERGY CYCLES. 31 |
| | 3.2 DATA FOR ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTIVITY. 31 |
| | 3.3 DATA FOR BIODIVERSITY INDICATORS . 34 |
| | 4. IMPLICATIONS FOR INVENTORY. 38 |
| | 4.1 TYPICAL LOCATIONS OF SPECIFIC HUMAN ACTIVITIES 38 |
| | 4.2 SIZE OF AREA AFFECTED 40 |
| | 4.3 CURRENT RELAXATION POTENTIALS 40 |
| | 4.4 CURRENT INDICATOR LEVEL FOR DIFFERENT HUMAN ACTIVITIES. 40 |
| | 4.5 RELAXATION PERIODS. 41 |
| | 5. EXAMPLES. 43 |
| | REFERENCES 47 |
| | ANNEX 1. 51 |
| | ANNEX 2. 52 |