| | Rapid Commercialization Initiative (RCI) Final Report for an |
| | 0,95 | | MB | Integrated in-situ Remediation Technology (Lasagna™) |
| | 131 | | stron |
| | 2119 | | ID | UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY |
| | 2002 | | rok |
| | Table of Contents |
| | A. TITLE PAGE .A-1 |
| | B. TABLE OF CONTENTS .B-1 |
| | List of TablesB-3 |
| | List of Figures.B-5 |
| | C. TECHNICAL SUMMARYC-1 |
| | Statement of the ProblemC-1 |
| | General Approach.C-2 |
| | Consortium Description C-3 |
| | Objective C-3 |
| | Project Description .C-5 |
| | Phase I Results C-5 |
| | Phase II Field Study C-6 |
| | Site Description and Contamination C-7 |
| | D. PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITY D-1 |
| | Consortium Organization D-1 |
| | RCI OrganizationD-2 |
| | Three Major Teams . D-2 |
| | Phase IIb Final Cleanup Team. D-2 |
| | RCI Process and Cost Validation Team . D-2 |
| | Phase IIa Test Cleanup Team. D-2 |
| | Discussion of Figure D-3. D-2 |
| | QA Functions D-2 |
| | Personnel . D-3 |
| | Paducah Department of Energy (DOE) Project Manager - Myrna Redfield D-3 |
| | LMES, Environmental Restoration (ER), Program Manager - Fraser Johnstone D-3 |
| | LMES, ER, Technical Oversight Coordinator - Jay Clausen (currently Jeff Douthitt). D-3 |
| | LMES, ER, Quality Assurance (QA) Specialist - Jennifer Blewett. D-3 |
| | CDMFPC Federal Analytical Laboratory D-3 |
| | ORNL/GJ Analytical Laboratory . D-3 |
| | LMUS Analytical Laboratory D-3 |
| | Oak Ridge DOE Project Manager - Leon Duquella D-4 |
| | MSE/Cost Verifier - Stephen Antonioli. D-4 |
| | RCI/DOE Verification Entity - David Carden D-4 |
| | RCI/EPA Representative - Sam Hayes D-4 |
| | Third-Party Laboratory. D-4 |
| | Data Validator . D-4 |
| | E. COMPARISON OF ACTUAL ACTIVITIES TO THOSE PLANNED IN THE QAPP.E-1 |
| | Phase II Cleanup Levels E-1 |
| | Original Phase IIa Field Experiment Cleanup Levels E-1 |
| | Actual Cleanup Levels E-1 |
| | Comparison with Original QAPP. E-2 |
| | F. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS RESULTS F-1 |
| | Sampling Plan . F-1 |
| | Quality Assurance and Quality Control and Data Usability F-1 |
| | Sampling Results. F-1 |
| | Soil Sample Results. F-4 |
| | Search for Chlorinated Degradation Products. F-10 |
| | Water Sample Results F-11 |
| | TCE Pore Water ConcentrationsF-11 |
| | TCE Concentrations in Wells 03 - 05.F-11 |
| | Carbon Sample Results F-14 |
| | Flux Chamber Results F-14 |
| | Acetylene, Ethane, and Ethylene Degradation Products F-14 |
| | Dechlorination of TCE in the Phase IIa Field Test F-16 |
| | IntroductionF-16 |
| | Rate of Dechlorination F-17 |
| | Design of treatment zonesF-17 |
| | Installation & OperationF-19 |
| | Dechlorination Results F-19 |
| | G. TREATMENT EFFECTIVENESS VERIFICATION.G-19 |
| | 1.0 Introduction .G-1 |
| | 1.1 Objective G-1 |
| | 1.2 Quality Assurance Project Plan G-1 |
| | 2.0 Assessment Approach G-1 |
| | 3.0 Results.G-1 |
| | 3.1 Field Sample Collection Assessment . G-2 |
| | 3.1.1 Sampling Technique Evaluation. G-2 |
| | 3.1.2 Control of Cross Contamination G-2 |
| | 3.1.3 Field Precision G-2 |
| | 3.2 Analytical Laboratory Operations Assessment G-5 |
| | 3.2.1 Analytical Laboratory Technique Evaluation . G-6 |
| | 3.2.2 Laboratory Proficiency Evaluation G-6 |
| | 3.2.3 Reference Laboratory Data Validation. G-6 |
| | 3.2.4 Accuracy and Precision of Analytical Data G-7 |
| | 3.2.4.1 Interlaboratory Comparisons G-7 |
| | 3.2.4.2 Intralaboratory Comparisons G-13 |
| | 3.2.5 Analytical Method Quality Control for Soil Analysis. G-15 |
| | 3.3 Rollup Assessment and Statistical Evaluation of Data Quality Objectives G-17 |
| | 3.3.1 Data Quality Issues and Limitations . G-17 |
| | 3.3.2 Evaluation of Trends. G-17 |
| | 3.3.2.1 Treatment Effectiveness . G-17 |
| | 3.3.2.2 Progress in Meeting Action Levels . G-18 |
| | 4.0 Conclusions G-18 |
| | H. SUMMARY OF INSTALLATION COSTS, LASAGNA™ PHASE IIA TESTH-1 |
| | Summary H-1 |
| | IntroductionH-2 |
| | Phase IIa Installation Costs .H-2 |
| | Phase IIa Test Operating and Maintenance Costs H-5 |
| | Discussion of Phase IIa CostsH-6 |
| | Simple Core Cost Estimates For A Full Scale Lasagna™ Remediation Based on Depth, Time, and |
| | Pore Volumes Required H-7 |
| | I. REFERENCES, MERIT OF THE TECHNOLOGY, ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS I-1 |
| | Merit of the Technology.I-2 |
| | Lasagna™ Technology . I-2 |
| | Abbreviations.I-2 |
| | Electro-Kinetics .I-3 |
| | Electro-Osmosis.I-3 |
| | References. I-5 |
| | J. CONCLUSIONS . J-1 |
| | APPENDIX A. VERIFICATION STATEMENT . APPENDIX A-1 |
| | APPENDIX B. PRE-TEST CONCENTRATIONS OBTAINED IN MARCH 1996 APPENDIX B-1 |
| | APPENDIX C. SECTIONS E - G IN QAPP . APPENDIX C-1 |
| | APPENDIX D. TABULAR DATA PLOTTED IN THE FIGURES OF SECTIONS F AND G. APPENDIX |
| | D-1 |
| | APPENDIX E. QA AUDITS.APPENDIX E-1 |
| | APPENDIX F. MEASUREMENT OF C2 HYDROCARBONS IN WELL WATER SAMPLES.APPENDIX |
| | F-1 |
| | APPENDIX F-1 |