| | EXAMPLE APPROACH FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SITE-SPECIFIC |
| | 2,05 | | MB | PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION GOALS FOR PROTECTION OF |
| | 96 | | stron | ECOLOGICAL AND HUMAN HEALTH AT NAVY AQUATIC SITES |
| | 2201 | | ID | Science Applications International Corporation |
| | 2001 | | rok |
| | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | 1. INTRODUCTION. 1 |
| | 1.1. Objectives 1 |
| | 1.2. Background. 2 |
| | 1.3. Case Study Risk Assessment Summary 4 |
| | 1.4. Organization of this Report 7 |
| | 2. PRG DERIVATION . 8 |
| | 2.1. Aquatic PRG Derivation. 9 |
| | 2.1.1. Aquatic Threshold Effects Value Derivation Approach . 9 |
| | 2.1.2. Aquatic Case Study Example 19 |
| | 2.2. Avian Predator PRG Derivation 22 |
| | 2.2.1. Avian Predator Threshold Effects Value Derivation Approach 22 |
| | 2.2.2. Avian Predator Case Study Example 24 |
| | 2.3. Human Health PRG Derivation. 25 |
| | 2.3.1. Human Health Threshold Effects Value Derivation Approach 25 |
| | 2.3.2. Human Health Case Study Example . 29 |
| | 3. PRG IMPLEMENTATION . 30 |
| | 3.1. Translation of Threshold Effects Values into PRGs 30 |
| | 3.1.1. Example Aquatic PRGs Calculation . 30 |
| | 3.1.2. Example Avian Predator/Human Health PRGs Calculation. 32 |
| | 3.1.3. Case Study Results 33 |
| | 3.2. Example Approach for Spatial Implementation of PRGs. 33 |
| | 3.3. Assessment of PRGs for Risk Reduction. 34 |
| | 3.3.1. General PRG Assessment Approach. 34 |
| | 3.3.2. Case Study Aquatic PRG Assessment 35 |
| | 3.3.3. Case Study Avian Predator PRG Assessment. 39 |
| | 3.3.4. Case Study Human Health PRG Assessment 39 |
| | 3.4. Overall Summary 40 |
| | 4. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS . 42 |
| | 5. LITERATURE CITED. 43 |