| | Climate Change 2001: Mitigation |
| | 7,49 | | MB |
| | 753 | | stron |
| | 2356 | | ID | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change |
| | 2003 | | rok |
| | Introduction |
| | 1. This report assesses the scientific, technical, environmental, economic and social aspects of the |
| | mitigation of climate change. Research in climate change mitigation1 has continued since the |
| | publication of the IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR), taking into account political changes |
| | such as the agreement on the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on |
| | Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1997, and is reported on here. The Report also draws on a number of |
| | IPCC Special Reports, notably the Special Report on Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, the |
| | Special Report on Methodological and Technological Issues in Technology Transfer (SRTT), the |
| | Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES), and the Special Report on Land Use, Land Use |
| | Change and Forestry (SRLULUCF). |
| | 2. Climate change is a problem with unique characteristics. It is global, long-term (up to several |
| | centuries), and involves complex interactions between climatic, environmental, economic, political, |
| | institutional, social and technological processes. This may have significant international and |
| | intergenerational implications in the context of broader societal goals such as equity and sustainable |
| | development. Developing a response to climate change is characterized by decision-making under |
| | uncertainty and risk, including the possibility of non-linear and/or irreversible changes (Sections |
| | 1.2.5, 1.3, 10.1.2, 10.1.4, 10.4.5). |
| | 3. Alternative development paths4 can result in very different greenhouse gas emissions. The |
| | SRES and the mitigation scenarios assessed in this report suggest that the type, magnitude, timing |
| | and costs of mitigation depend on different national circumstances and socio-economic, and |
| | technological development paths and the desired level of greenhouse gas concentration stabilization |
| | in the atmosphere (see Figure SPM.1 for an example for total CO2 emissions). Development paths |
| | leading to low emissions depend on a wide range of policy choices and require major policy |
| | changes in areas other than climate change (Sections 2.2.2, 2.3.2, 2.4.4, 2.5). |
| | 4. Climate change mitigation will both be affected by, and have impacts on, broader socio- |
| | economic policies and trends, such as those relating to development, sustainability and equity. |
| | Climate mitigation policies may promote sustainable development when they are consistent with |
| | such broader societal objectives. Some mitigation actions may yield extensive benefits in areas |
| | outside of climate change: for example, they may reduce health problems; increase employment; |
| | reduce negative environmental impacts (like air pollution); protect and enhance forests, soils and |
| | watersheds; reduce those subsidies and taxes which enhance greenhouse gas emissions; and |
| | induce technological change and diffusion, contributing to wider goals of sustainable development. |
| | Similarly, development paths that meet sustainable development objectives may result in lower |
| | levels of greenhouse gas emissions (Sections 1.3, 1.4, 2.2.3, 2.4.4, 2.5, 7.2.2, 8.2.4). |
| | 5. Differences in the distribution of technological, natural and financial resources among and within |
| | nations and regions, and between generations, as well as differences in mitigation costs, are often |
| | key considerations in the analysis of climate change mitigation options. Much of the debate about |
| | the future differentiation of contributions of countries to mitigation and related equity issues also |
| | considers these circumstances5. The challenge of addressing climate change raises an important |
| | issue of equity, namely the extent to which the impacts of climate change or mitigation policies |
| | create or exacerbate inequities both within and across nations and regions. Greenhouse gas |
| | stabilization scenarios assessed in this report (except those where stabilization occurs without new |
| | climate policies, e.g. B1) assume that developed countries and countries with economies in |
| | transition limit and reduce their greenhouse gas emissions first. |
| | 6 Emissions from all regions diverge from baselines at some point. Global emissions diverge earlier |
| | and to a greater extent as stabilization levels are lower or underlying scenarios are higher. Such |
| | scenarios are uncertain, do not provide information on equity implications and how such changes |
| | may be achieved or who may bear any costs incurred. This usage differs from that in the |
| | UNFCCC, where climate change refers to a change of climate that is attributed directly or indirectly |
| | to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and that is in addition to |
| | natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods. |