| | Can National Governments Address a Global Problem? |
| | 3,19 | | MB |
| | 37 | | stron |
| | 2378 | | ID | Harvard University |
| | 2001 | | rok |
| | Concerns about global climate change due to the greenhouse effect have led policymakers from |
| | many countries to consider ways of limiting emissions of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon |
| | dioxide (CQ2) emissions associated with the generation of energy from fossil fuels.1 Although there |
| | still is much debate about the desirability of limiting CQ2 and other greenhouse gas emissions, it is |
| | important to consider policy instruments that may be able to meet forthcoming targets.2 In a |
| | recent essay, Professor SchInalensee convincingly argues that "the creation of durable institutions |
| | and frameworks seems both logically prior to and more important than the choice of a particular |
| | policy program that will almost surely be viewed as too strong or too weak within a decade."3 My |
| | primary purpose in this Article is to explore frameworks and instruments that individual nations and |
| | groups of nations can adopt and to achieve goals that may be specified by future "policy |
| | programs." This exploration strongly reaffirms that institutional dimensions of the global climate |
| | change policy problem are exceptionally important. |
| | I begin-in Part I of this Article-by considering some criteria for assessing policy instruments and by |
| | describing the major alternative instruments available. In Parts II and III, respectively, I review |
| | conventional regulatory and market-based instruments. In Part IV , I focus on implementation |
| | issues; in Part V, I provide a comparative assessment of instruments; and in Part VI, I offer some |
| | conclusions. |