| | Status, trends and the future of the marine pelagic ecosystem |
| | 0,47 | | MB |
| | 31 | | stron |
| | 2520 | | ID | Alfred-Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research |
| | 2003 | | rok |
| | SUMMARY |
| | Globally, humans impact environments and ecosystems faster than they become aware of their |
| | effects. |
| | The marine pelagic ecosystem includes a tremendously large and diverse environment, which might |
| | accordingly be considered to be resilient to externally forced changes, whether from humans or |
| | climate. |
| | This review considers that general hypothesis by pursuing two objectives. The first is to document |
| | the current status of and recent anthropogenic impacts on the marine pelagic ecosystem, with |
| | emphasis on the epipelagic zone (0–200 m) where organisms are concentrated and human impacts |
| | have been greatest. It shows that humans have proven capable of assuming the role of top |
| | carnivore in pelagic ecosystems where living resources are attractive and financially amenable to |
| | exploitation, and that overexploitation is the rule under such circumstances. Other anthropogenic |
| | activities associated with changes in various marine pelagic ecosystems, such as increased |
| | diseases, mortalities, extinctions, habitat invasions, and species replacements, function as |
| | sentinels and indicate that portions of the pelagic ecosystem are under considerable stress. It is |
| | argued that, without attention, these problems can be expected to worsen up to the year 2025 and |
| | beyond. In addition to a comprehensive evaluation of status and trends relating to conservation of |
| | the marine pelagic ecosystem, a second major objective is to evaluate whether current paradigms |
| | of ecosystem function are sufficient to improve the ability of the scientific community to predict |
| | future changes and to recommend relevant management strategies. This review differs from |
| | previous ones by proposing that current conceptual models have failed to provide the basis for |
| | accurately predicting patterns and features of pelagic communities, notably why specific organisms |
| | occur where and when they do. It is argued that predation pressure is shaped by natural selection |
| | in the sea as on land, and that it influences organism behaviour, life history strategy and |
| | morphology, all of which determine marine pelagic ecosystem structure, and therefore should be |
| | used to interpret function. From this perspective, attempting to understand present patterns and |
| | predict the future of marine pelagic ecosystems, without understanding the intertwined roles of |
| | evolution and predation in forging contemporary pelagic communities, is a hopeless endeavour. It is |
| | proposed that both perspectives, resource availability and predation pressure, be incorporated into |
| | a revised paradigm of pelagic ecosystem structure and function, a necessity if policies are to |
| | predict anthropogenic impacts and environmental conservation is to be effective. |
| | Keywords: marine, pelagic, ecosystem, pollution, extinction, invasions |