| | Study on measures other than criminal ones in cases where |
| | 3,18 | | MB | environmental Community law has not been respected in a few |
| | 300 | | stron | candidate countries |
| | 2567 | | ID | Milieu Ltd |
| | 2005 | | rok |
| | Table of contents |
| | I. Introduction .. 3 |
| | II. Executive summary . 5 |
| | III. Comparative overview of non-criminal sanctions .. 7 |
| | III.1. Types of enforcement systems .. .. 7 |
| | III.2. Cumulation between the different systems of sanctions 8 |
| | III.3. Unification vs. fragmentation of the sanction elements in the environmental administrative law |
| | . 9 |
| | III.4. Comparative analysis of the administrative sanctions . 11 |
| | III.5. Fine .. 22 |
| | III.6. General principles behind the administrative environmental law sanctions 24 |
| | III.7. Is there a different pattern of administrative sanctions concerning the protection of different |
| | environmental media? .. 26 |
| | III.8. Public participation in environmental administrative law enforcement 28 |
| | III.9. Comparison with civil law sanctions . 29 |
| | III.10. The role of prosecutors and ombudsmen in environmental enforcement 30 |
| | IV. Analysis of the effectiveness (including the experiences of case studies) 32 |
| | IV.1. Lessons learned from the case studies 32 |
| | IV.2. Comparative statistical data on environmental law enforcement . 32 |
| | IV.3. Deterrent effect, recidivism 35 |
| | IV.4. Level of tolerance, possibility to negotiate with the non-compliant 36 |
| | IV.5. Social disapproval 37 |
| | IV.6. Inter-agency communication .. 38 |
| | IV.7. Summary of the practical experiences on the main effectiveness factors in a table .. 39 |
| | V. Conclusions, suggestions . 41 |
| | V.1. The main conclusions .. 41 |
| | V.2. The main suggestions .. 42 |
| | V.3. Detailed suggestions on problems with effectiveness of environmental law enforcement 44 |