Administrative Tools and Incentives for Sustainable Brownfield

1,81
MB Regeneration D 2-5.2

306
stron

3113
ID RESCUE consortium Land Quality Management Group

2005
rok

Contents:

1. Introduction 5

2. Incentives for Brownfield redevelopment in the EU, France, Germany, Poland and the UK- the

current situation 16

2.1 Financial Incentives/ Public Funding 16

2.2 Legal Incentives 85

3. Deficit analyses WP 2, 3, 4 and 5 123

3.1 WP 2, Deliverable D 2.2- Deficit Analysis 123

3.2 WP 3, Deliverable D 3.2- Deficit Analysis 138

4.2 WP 4, Deliverable D 4.2- Deficit Analysis 154

5.2 WP 5, Deliverable D 5.2- Deficit Analysis 163

4. Problem-related proposals 172

4.1 WP 2, Deliverable D 2.2- Problem related proposals 172

4.2 WP 3, Deliverable D 3.2- Problem related proposals 177

4.3 WP 4, Deliverable D 4.2- Problem related proposals: Strategic in-centives for sustainable land

use and urban design on brownfield sites 183

4.3 WP 4, Deliverable D 4.2- Problem related proposals: Strategic in-centives for citizen

participation on brownfield projects 188

5. Sustainability Assesment Tool for Brownfield Regeneration Projects 201

5.1 Abstract 201

5.2 Introduction 201

5.3 The Philosophy of the SAT 204

5.3.1 What is the purpose of the SAT 204

5.3.2 What is the approach of the SAT 204

5.3.3 Who is going to use the SAT 205

5.3.4 What are the benefits of the SAT 206

5.3.5 What are the steps of the SAT 207

5.3.6 What are the limits of the SAT 208

5.3.7 How was the SAT developed 209

5.4 The methodology of the SAT 211

5.4.1 Actor collaboration to set priorities on aspects of sustainability 211

5.4.1.1 Who is organising the process 211

5.4.1.2 Why organize a workshop 212

5.4.1.3 What is to be prioritised 212

5.4.1.4 Who participates in the workshop 214

5.4.1.5 Preparation of the workshop 215

5.4.1.6 The workshop 216

5.4.2 Funding application by the project developer 222

5.4.3 Quantified assessment model for decision making 223

5.4.4 Detailed describtion of the method 224

5.4.5 Worked examples 225

Annex I: Other Assesment tools 231

Annex II: Actor Collaboration Questionaire 232

Annex III: Funding application 252

Annex IV: Scoring questions to be used by the funding institutions 273