| | UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION: FINAL |
| | 5,95 | | MB | ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT- - CANNIKIN, JUNE 1971 |
| | 120 | | stron |
| | 3541 | | ID | UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION |
| | 2006 | | rok |
| | CONTENTS |
| | SUMMARYSTATEMENT.1 |
| | BACKGROUND 5 |
| | CANNIKIN-WHAT AND WHY 5 |
| | WHY AMCHITKA? 5 |
| | GEOLOGIC HISTORY 6 |
| | NATURAL HISTORY 7 |
| | SEA OTTER TRANSPLANTS 11 |
| | HISTORY OF USE OF AMCHITKA BY MAN 12 |
| | IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT 14 |
| | RADIOACTIVITY - ATMISPHERIC AND SURFACE 14 |
| | RADIOACTIVITY GROUNDWATER 20 |
| | THE AMCHITKA BIOENVIRONMENTAL PHIGRAM 26 |
| | SUMMARY OF MILROW BIOENVIRONMeNTAL PREDICTIONS |
| | SUMMARY OF MILROW BIOENVIRONMENTAL EXPERIENCE |
| | PREDICTION OF EFFECTS FROM CANNIKIN . |
| | CANNIKIN Sampling 41 |
| | COORDINATION AND REVIEW PROCEDURES 43 |
| | REVIEW PROCEDURES s 44 |
| | ALTERNATIVES 46 |
| | SHORT-TERM USES 47 |
| | IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF NATURALRESOURCES |
| | APPENDIX |
| | EFFECTS RELATED TO GRDUND |
| | CONCLUSION. |
| | BIBLIOGRAPHY . |