| | Update of the MARINA Project on the radiological exposure of |
| | 16,9 | | MB | the European Community from radioactivity in North European |
| | 477 | | stron | marine waters |
| | 3584 | | ID | Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science |
| | 2003 | | rok |
| | Contents |
| | Update of the MARINA Project on the radiological exposure of the European Community from |
| | radioactivity in North European marine waters |
| | The MARINA II study provides information on radioactive discharges to the North East Atlantic, on |
| | radionuclide concentrations in various marine environmental media and an assessment of their |
| | impact on humans and marine biota. |
| | Compared to the mid 60’s, by the end of the 1990s, the overall civil nuclear and other |
| | anthropogenic inputs of radioactivity into the North East Atlantic have decreased by several orders |
| | of magnitude for alpha- and beta-emitters and for tritium. The maximum levels were reached in the |
| | 1960s and early 1970s. Over the same time period this resulted in reductions in radionuclide |
| | concentrations in the marine environment and consequently in reductions in the individual doses to |
| | members of critical groups and in collective doses to the public. |
| | Since the mid-1980s, the main contribution to discharges of beta-activity into the OSPAR region is |
| | from nuclear reprocessing plants (Sellafield and Cap de la Hague) while the discharges of alpha- |
| | activity have been dominated by the phosphate industry and by oil and gas production in the North |
| | Sea. As a result of the activities discharged and the higher biological effectiveness of alpha |
| | radiation, phosphate and oil production currently are the major contributors to collective dose to the |
| | population of the European Union from industrial activities. Other sources (e.g. production and |
| | application of radiopharmaceuticals, discharges from shipyards servicing nuclear submarines in the |
| | UK, historic dumping of wastes at sea and accidental releases other than Chernobyl) are |
| | comparably negligible. |
| | Over the period 1988 to 1999 effective doses to critical groups in the Sellafield area show no |
| | downward trends partly due to the impact of remobilisation of plutonium isotopes from historic |
| | discharges, which are contained in the sediments of the Irish Sea, leading to relatively stable |
| | plutonium concentrations in sea water and thus in seafood. In addition, since 1994 the treatment of |
| | historic liquid wastes led to increased discharges of technetium-99, adding to the exposure. For the |
| | Cap de la Hague area there is a decreasing trend in effective doses since 1988. For the OSPAR |
| | region in general the doses to critical groups follow the same decreasing trend as the environmental |
| | radionuclide concentrations. |
| | Doses to non-human biota due to industrial activities are low (order of magnitude of natural |
| | background level). Based on today’s knowledge detrimental effects to populations of marine biota |
| | are not expected. |
| | The text of the Executive Summary (330 KB) |
| | Annex A: Civil Nuclear Discharges into North European Waters (890 KB) |
| | Annex B: Environmental Data (4 MB) |
| | Annex C: Analysis of Data on Seafood Catches and Trade (340 KB) |
| | Annex D: Radiological Impact on EU Member States of Radioactivity in North European Waters |
| | (1,4 MB) |
| | Annex E: Critical Group Exposure (150 KB) |
| | Annex F: Assessment of the Impact of Radioactive Substances on Marine Biota of North |
| | European Waters (310 KB) |
| | The printed version of RP 132 consists of two Volumes. Volume I contains the Executive |
| | Summary and the Annexes A and B, Volume II contains the Annexes C to F. It can be ordered from |
| | the radiation protection unit. |
| | A European Manual to Off-site Emergency Planning and Response to Nuclear Accidents (4,6 MB) |
| | prepared by the Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK-CEN) under contract SUBV/00/277065 |