| | Critical review of epidemiological evidence of the health effects |
| | 0,31 | | MB | of wastewater and excreta use in agriculture |
| | 42 | | stron |
| | 3659 | | ID | London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine |
| | 2005 | | rok |
| | Table of contents |
| | Table of contents i |
| | List of tables ii |
| | List of figures iii |
| | Glossary of epidemiological terms iv |
| | Summary v |
| | 1. Introduction 1 |
| | 2. Selection of studies and methods 1 |
| | 3. Description and quality of selected studies 2 |
| | 4. Summary of results 7 |
| | 4.1 Risks to consumers from wastewater irrigation of crops eaten uncooked 7 |
| | 4.1.1 Ascaris infection 7 |
| | 4.1.2 Bacterial and viral infections 7 |
| | 4.1.3 Overall 9 |
| | 4.2 Risks to agricultural workers and their families from direct contact with wastewater and to |
| | populations living nearby fields sprinkler-irrigated with wastewater 9 |
| | 4.2.1 Intestinal parasite infections 9 |
| | 4.2.2 Reported enteric infection 11 |
| | 4.2.3 Serological studies 13 |
| | 4.2.4 Overall 15 |
| | 4.3 Risks to consumers of vegetables and to farming families from use of excreta to fertilize crops |
| | 15 |
| | 5. Discussion 17 |
| | 5.1 Limitations of the literature 17 |
| | 5.2 Review of findings and application to derivation of guidelines for wastewater reuse |
| | 5.2.1 Category A Unrestricted irrigation 21 |
| | 5.2.2 Category B Restricted irrigation 22 |
| | 5.3 Review of findings and application to derivation of guidelines for excreta reuse 24 |
| | 5.4 Adequacy of the information for the derivation of guidelines for wastewater reuse 24 |
| | 5.5 Water quality guidelines or health targets 26 |
| | 6. Conclusions 28 |
| | 7. References 31 |