| | Regionally Based Assessment of Persistent Toxic Substances |
| | 5,23 | | MB |
| | 158 | | stron |
| | 3693 | | ID | UNEP Chemicals |
| | 2003 | | rok |
| | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | PREFACE VI |
| | EXECUTIVE SUMMMARYVII |
| | 1. INTRODUCTION. 1 |
| | 1.1. BACKGROUND. 1 |
| | 1.2. OVERVIEW OF THE RBA PTS PROJECT . 1 |
| | 1.2.1. Objectives .1 |
| | 1.2.2. Results2 |
| | 1.3. METHODOLOGY. 2 |
| | 1.3.1. Regional divisions.2 |
| | 1.3.2. Management structure.2 |
| | 1.3.3. Data processing..2 |
| | 1.3.4. Project funding3 |
| | 1.4. SCOPE OF THE EUROPEAN REGIONAL ASSESSMENT.. 3 |
| | 1.4.1. Introduction.3 |
| | 1.4.2. Omissions/weaknesses3 |
| | 1.4.3. Other European Assessment projects..4 |
| | 1.5. GENERAL DEFINITIONS OF CHEMICALS. 5 |
| | 1.5.1. Persistent Toxic Substances.5 |
| | 1.5.2. Pesticides..5 |
| | 1.5.3. Industrial Chemicals 8 |
| | 1.5.4. Unintended by-products.9 |
| | 1.5.5. Other PTS of emerging concern in Europe..9 |
| | 1.6. PHYSICAL SETTING 15 |
| | 1.6.1. Physical/geographical description of the terrestrial Europe .15 |
| | 1.6.2. Climate and meteorology16 |
| | 1.6.3. European freshwater environments16 |
| | 1.6.4. European marine environment.17 |
| | 1.7. PATTERNS OF DEVELOPMENT/SETTLEMENT.. 18 |
| | 1.8. REFERENCES.. 19 |
| | 2. SOURCES OF PTS . 22 |
| | 2.1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION TO PTS SOURCES. 22 |
| | 2.2. DATA COLLECTION AND QUALITY CONTROL ISSUES. 22 |
| | 2.2.1. Introduction..22 |
| | 2.2.2. Emission inventories.22 |
| | 2.2.3. Conceptual approach.23 |
| | 2.3. PESTICIDES.. 24 |
| | 2.3.1. Aldrin ..24 |
| | 2.3.2. Chlordane..24 |
| | 2.3.3. DDTs25 |
| | 2.3.4. Dieldrin 25 |
| | 2.3.5. Endrin..25 |
| | 2.3.6. Heptachlor.25 |
| | 2.3.7. Hexachlorobenzene25 |
| | 2.3.8. Mirex26 |
| | 2.3.9. Toxaphene.26 |
| | 2.4. INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS. 26 |
| | 2.4.1. Polychlorinated biphenyls..26 |
| | 2.5. UNINTENDED BY-PRODUCTS 27 |
| | 2.5.1. Dioxins and furans .27 |
| | 2.6. OTHER PTS OF EMERGING CONCERN IN EUROPE 28 |
| | 2.6.1. Brominated flame retardants.28 |
| | 2.6.2. Lindane (γ-HCH) 28 |
| | 2.6.3. Organic mercury .29 |
| | 2.6.4. Organic tin .29 |
| | 2.6.5. Pentachlorophenol..29 |
| | 2.6.6. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.30 |
| | 2.6.7. Short chain chlorinated paraffins 32 |
| | 2.6.8. Hexabromobiphenyl..34 |
| | 2.7. CONLUSIONS.. 34 |
| | 2.8. REFERENCES.. 35 |
| | 3. ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS, TOXICOLOGICAL AND ECOTOXICOLOGICAL |
| | CHARACTERISATION .. 37 |
| | 3.1. LEVELS AND TRENDS.. 37 |
| | 3.1.1. Introduction..37 |
| | 3.1.2. Air .37 |
| | 3.1.3. References.41 |
| | 3.1.4. Deposition.43 |
| | 3.1.5. Snow and ice .45 |
| | 3.1.6. Aquatic ecosystems45 |
| | 3.1.7. Terrestrial ecosystems..59 |
| | 3.1.8. Hot spots .67 |
| | 3.1.9. Conclusions..72 |
| | 3.2. ECOTOXICOLOGY OF PTS OF REGIONAL CONCERN . 74 |
| | 3.2.1. Introduction..74 |
| | 3.2.2. Overview of harmful effects .74 |
| | 3.2.3. Mechanisms of harmful effects74 |
| | 3.2.4. Ecotoxicological effects on the particular types of biota77 |
| | 3.2.5. Ecotoxicological databases and laboratory and field studies79 |
| | 3.2.6. Data gaps80 |
| | 3.2.7. References.81 |
| | 3.3. HUMAN EFFECTS OF PTS OF REGIONAL CONCERN 85 |
| | 3.3.1. Introduction..85 |
| | 3.3.2. Overview of harmful effects .86 |
| | 3.3.3. National and regional human health effects reports..88 |
| | 3.3.4. Conclusions..90 |
| | 3.3.5. References.90 |
| | 3.4. HUMAN EXPOSURE TO PTS COMPOUNDS IN REGION III – EUROPE . 92 |
| | 3.4.1. Introduction..92 |
| | 3.4.2. PCBs 93 |
| | 3.4.3. PCDD/Fs.95 |
| | 3.4.4. HCB .99 |
| | 3.4.5. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers100 |
| | 3.4.6. Conlusions..100 |
| | 3.4.7. References..101 |
| | 4. ASSESSMENT OF MAJOR PATHWAYS OF CONTAMINANTS TRANSPORT. 103 |
| | 4.1. GENERAL FEATURES . 103 |
| | 4.2. REGION SPECIFIC FEATURES.. 104 |
| | 4.3. OVERVIEW OF EXISTING MODELLING PROGRAMMES AND PROJECTS . 104 |
| | 4.3.1. Introduction104 |
| | 4.3.2. Steady state models.104 |
| | 4.3.3. Dynamic models ..105 |
| | 4.4. EMEP/MSCE-POP MODEL – A MODEL USED IN THE REGION 107 |
| | 4.4.1. Introduction107 |
| | 4.4.2. Benzo(a)pyrene (B(a)P) 108 |
| | 4.4.3. γ-HCH..111 |
| | 4.4.4. Polychlorinated biphenyls113 |
| | 4.4.5. Hexachlorobenzene (HCB).114 |
| | 4.4.6. PCDDs/Fs 116 |
| | 4.5. EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR LONG-RANGE TRANSPORT (LRT) .. 118 |
| | 4.6. CONCLUSIONS . 120 |
| | 4.7. REFERENCES 121 |
| | 5. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE REGIONAL CAPACITY AND NEED |
| | TO MANAGE PTS .. 123 |
| | 5.1. INTRODUCTION. 123 |
| | 5.2. MONITORING CAPACITY 123 |
| | 5.2.1. Introduction123 |
| | 5.2.2. Existing regional monitoring programmes .124 |
| | 5.2.3. Local monitoring..125 |
| | 5.3. EXISTING REGULATION AND MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES.. 125 |
| | 5.3.1. International 125 |
| | 5.3.2. Regional 125 |
| | 5.4. WHITE PAPER ON THE COMMISSION ON A NEW CHEMICALS POLICY IN EUROPE.. 127 |
| | 5.4.1. National128 |
| | 5.5. STATUS OF ENFORCEMENT . 128 |
| | 5.6. ALTERNATIVES OR MEASURES FOR REDUCTION. 128 |
| | 5.7. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER . 131 |
| | 5.8. IDENTIFICATION OF NEEDS . 132 |
| | 5.9. CONCLUSIONS . 134 |
| | 5.10. REFERENCES 134 |
| | CONCLUSIONS 134 |
| | ANNEX I . 143 |