| | ESTABLISHMENT OF ECOLOGICAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES (EcoQOs) |
| | 1,65 | | MB | FOR A REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM APPROACH IN THE BALTIC SEA. |
| | 77 | | stron |
| | 3713 | | ID | University of Plymouth |
| | 2003 | | rok |
| | LIST OF CONTENTS |
| | ABSTRACT 3 |
| | LIST OF CONTENTS 4 |
| | LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES USED 6 |
| | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 |
| | 1.0 INTRODUCTION 8 |
| | 1.1 SUSTAINABILITY 8 |
| | 1.2 THESIS OVERVIEW 9 |
| | 2.0 BACKGROUND – THE CONTEXT 10 |
| | 2.1 RELAVANT GLOBAL CONVENTIONS 11 |
| | 2.2 REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS 13 |
| | 2.2.1 THE BALTIC SEA 13 |
| | 2.2.1.1 ABIOTIC VARIABILITY 14 |
| | 2.2.1.2 BIOTIC VARIABILITY 15 |
| | 2.2.1.3 A UNIQUE AND VULNERABLE MARINE ENVIRONMENT 15 |
| | 2.2.2 SOCIO-ECONOMIC DIVERSITY 15 |
| | 2.2.3 INTERACTION WITH THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT 17 |
| | 2.2.4 INTERLINKED SUSTAINABILITY 18 |
| | 2.2.5 A REGIONAL INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 18 |
| | 2.2.5.1 TWO MAJOR PLAYERS 18 |
| | 2.2.5.2 OTHER INSTITUTIONAL COOPERATING BODIES 19 |
| | 2.3 TOWARDS A REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM APPROACH 21 |
| | 3.0 METHODOLOGY 21 |
| | 3.1 THE STUDY 21 |
| | 3.1.1 INTERVIEWEES 21 |
| | 3.1.2 THE QUESTIONNAIRE 22 |
| | 3.1.3 QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS 22 |
| | 4.0 RESULTS 22 |
| | 4.1 BARRIERS TO THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH 22 |
| | 4.2 ATTITUDES ON ASSESSEMENT AND MANAGEMENT 23 |
| | 4.3 CRITERIA FOR GOOD EcoQOs 24 |
| | 4.4 PRIORITIZATION OF KEY ISSUES 25 |
| | 5.0 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION 27 5.1 CHAPTER 1 – BARRIERS TO THE ECOSYSTEM |
| | APPROACH 27 |
| | 5.1.1 HUMAN NATURE RELATIONSHIP 27 |
| | 5.1.2 ADOPTING THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH 28 |
| | 5.1.2.1 THE BALTIC SEA REGION 30 |
| | 5.2 CHAPTER 2 - ADAPTIVE ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT 31 |
| | 5.2.1 AN ADAPTIVE APPROACH 31 |
| | 5.2.2 UNCERTAINTY 31 |
| | 5.2.3 THE BALTIC SEA 32 |
| | 5.2.3.1 ASSESSMENT 32 |
| | 5.2.3.2 MANAGEMENT 35 |
| | 5.3 CHAPTER 3 – AN ECOSYTEM APPROACH & EcoQO ROADMAP 36 |
| | 5.3.1 AN OVERVIEW 36 |
| | 5.3.2 POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT 37 |
| | 5.3.2.1 THE BREMEN MEETING 37 |
| | 5.3.2.2 THE KOGE CONFERENCE 38 |
| | 5.3.2.3 THE BERGEN DECLARATION 39 |
| | 5.3.3 SCIENTIFIC UNDERPINNINGS – APPROACH AND PROCESS 40 |
| | 5.3.3.1 AN OVERVIEW 40 |
| | 5.3.3.2 REGIONAL APPLICATION 41 |
| | 5.3.3.2.1 THE CONTEXT 41 |
| | 5.3.3.2.2 MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES – EcoQOs 42 |
| | 5.3.3.2.3 THE PROCESS 43 |
| | 5.3.4 A REGIONAL ROADMAP 45 |
| | 5.4 CHAPTER 4 - ISSUES AND CRITERIA FOR EcoQOs 47 |
| | 5.4.1 LOCALIZATION OF ISSUES 47 |
| | 5.4.2 INDICATOR DEVELOPMENT – EcoQOs 48 |
| | 5.4.3 PRIORITY ISSUES 50 |
| | 5.4.3.1 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES 50 |
| | 5.4.3.2 EUTROPHICATION AND NUTRIENT POLLUTION 52 |
| | 5.4.3.3 THREATENED / LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY 55 |
| | 5.4.3.4 HABITAT DEGRADATION 56 |
| | 5.4.3.5 AN INTERGATED HIGH PRIORITY INDICATOR 57 |
| | 5.4.4 PROPOSED EcoQOs 57 |
| | 5.4.5 CROSS-CHECKING EcoQOs WITH MANAGEMENT ACTION 58 |
| | 6.1 CONCLUSION 59 |
| | 6.2 FUTURE WORK 60 |
| | APPENDIX 1 : QUESTIONNAIRE 61 |
| | APPENDIX 2 : TERMS 67 |
| | APPENDIX 3 : OTHER ISSUES OF CONCERN 69 |
| | REFERENCES 73 |