| | APPROACH FOR THE MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT OF MARINE |
| | 1,15 | | MB | ECOSYSTEM HEALTH WITH APPLICATION TO THE MYA–MACOMA |
| | 90 | | stron | COMMUNITY |
| | 3764 | | ID | Maurice Lamontagne Institute |
| | 2004 | | rok |
| | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | LIST OF TABLES.v |
| | LIST OF FIGURESv |
| | ABSTRACTvi |
| | RÉSUMÉ.vii |
| | EXTENDED SUMMARY.viii |
| | 1. INTRODUCTION.1 |
| | 2. ECOSYSTEM HEALTH..2 |
| | 2.1. A concept under development2 |
| | 2.2. Ecosystem health in the present context4 |
| | 3. APPROACH FOR ASSESSING ECOSYSTEM HEALTH7 |
| | 3.1. Ecosystem organisational levels7 |
| | 3.1.1. Ecosystem development..8 |
| | 3.2. Ecosystem properties..8 |
| | 3.2.1. Individual level.9 |
| | 3.2.2. Population level.10 |
| | 3.2.3. Community level..14 |
| | 3.2.4. Ecosystem level—biological component.16 |
| | 3.2.5. Ecosystem level—chemical component17 |
| | 3.2.6. Ecosystem level—physical component.18 |
| | 3.3. Odum’s distress syndrome19 |
| | 4. INDICATORS AND BENCHMARKS..19 |
| | 4.1. Definition of indicators19 |
| | 4.2. Criteria for indicators..21 |
| | 4.3. Objectives and benchmarks..22 |
| | 4.4. Using successional trends for setting benchmarks23 |
| | 4.5. Indicator selection..24 |
| | 5. THE APPROACH APPLIED TO THE MYA–MACOMA COMMUNITY.25 |
| | 5.1. The Mya–Macoma community25 |
| | 5.2. Major issues affecting the Mya–Macoma community27 |
| | 5.3. Possible indicators in the Mya–Macoma community..33 |
| | 5.3.1. Individual level..33 |
| | 5.3.2. Population level.38 |
| | 5.3.3. Community level..41 |
| | 5.3.4. Ecosystem level—biological component.46 |
| | 5.3.5. Ecosystem level—chemical component50 |
| | 5.3.6. Ecosystem level—physical component.51 |
| | 5.4. Evaluation and selection of indicators.53 |
| | 5.4.1. Selection of a set of indicators53 |
| | 5.4.2. Comments on the indicator set..58 |
| | 6. CONCLUDING REMARKS58 |
| | 7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..59 |
| | 8. REFERENCES60 |
| | Appendix 77 |