| | Environmental Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident and |
| | 9,18 | | MB | their Remediation: Twenty Years of Experience |
| | 180 | | stron |
| | 3881 | | ID | International Atomic Energy Agency |
| | 2006 | | rok |
| | CONTENTS |
| | 1. SUMMARY . 1 |
| | 1.1. Introduction. 1 |
| | 1.2. Radioactive contamination of the environment . 2 |
| | 1.2.1. Conclusions. 2 |
| | 1.2.1.1. Radionuclide release and deposition2 |
| | 1.2.1.2. Urban environment 2 |
| | 1.2.1.3. Agricultural environment . 3 |
| | 1.2.1.4. Forest environment 4 |
| | 1.2.1.5. Aquatic environment. 4 |
| | 1.2.2. Recommendations for future research and monitoring 4 |
| | 1.2.2.1. General 4 |
| | 1.2.2.2. Practical 5 |
| | 1.2.2.3. Scientific . 5 |
| | 1.2.2.4. Specific recommendations 5 |
| | 1.3. Environmental countermeasures and remediation 6 |
| | 1.3.1. Conclusions. 6 |
| | 1.3.1.1. Radiological criteria6 |
| | 1.3.1.2. Urban countermeasures 7 |
| | 1.3.1.3. Agricultural countermeasures . 7 |
| | 1.3.1.4. Forest countermeasures 8 |
| | 1.3.1.5. Aquatic countermeasures . 8 |
| | 1.3.2. Recommendations . 8 |
| | 1.3.2.1. Countries affected by the Chernobyl accident 8 |
| | 1.3.2.2. Worldwide9 |
| | 1.3.2.3. Research . 9 |
| | 1.4. Human exposure. 9 |
| | 1.4.1. Conclusions. 10 |
| | 1.4.2. Recommendations . 11 |
| | 1.5. Radiation induced effects on plants and animals 12 |
| | 1.5.1. Conclusions. 12 |
| | 1.5.2. Recommendations for future research 13 |
| | 1.5.3. Recommendations for countermeasures and remediation 13 |
| | 1.6. Environmental and radioactive waste management aspects of the dismantling of the Chernobyl |
| | shelter 13 |
| | 1.6.1. Conclusions. 13 |
| | 1.6.2. Recommendations for future actions . 14 |
| | Reference to Section 1. 15 |
| | 2. INTRODUCTION . 16 |
| | 2.1. Background . 16 |
| | 2.2. Objectives of the Chernobyl Forum. 16 |
| | 2.3. Method of operation and output of the Chernobyl Forum17 |
| | 2.4. Structure of the report 17 |
| | References to Section 2 17 |
| | 3. RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT. 18 |
| | 3.1. Radionuclide release and deposition 18 |
| | 3.1.1. Radionuclide source term . 18 |
| | 3.1.2. Physical and chemical forms of released material . 20 |
| | 3.1.3. Meteorological conditions during the course of the accident21 |
| | 3.1.4. Concentration of radionuclides in air . 22 |
| | 3.1.5. Deposition of radionuclides on soil surfaces . 23 |
| | 3.1.6. Isotopic composition of the deposition 25 |
| | 3.2. Urban environment 27 |
| | 3.2.1. Deposition patterns 27 |
| | 3.2.2. Migration of radionuclides in the urban environment . 28 |
| | 3.2.3. Dynamics of the exposure rate in urban environments. 29 |
| | 3.3. Agricultural environment . 29 |
| | 3.3.1. Radionuclide transfer in the terrestrial environment 29 |
| | 3.3.2. Food production systems affected by the accident 30 |
| | 3.3.3. Effects on agriculture in the early phase. 30 |
| | 3.3.4. Effects on agriculture in the long term phase. 32 |
| | 3.3.4.1. Physicochemistry of radionuclides in the soil–plant system . 32 |
| | 3.3.4.2. Migration of radionuclides in soil. 33 |
| | 3.3.4.3. Radionuclide transfer from soil to crops. 34 |
| | 3.3.4.4. Dynamics of radionuclide transfer to crops 36 |
| | 3.3.4.5. Radionuclide transfer to animals . 38 |
| | 3.3.5. Current contamination of foodstuffs and expected future trends 40 |
| | 3.4. Forest environment 41 |
| | 3.4.1. Radionuclides in European forests . 41 |
| | 3.4.2. Dynamics of contamination during the early phase . 42 |
| | 3.4.3. Long term dynamics of radiocaesium in forests . 43 |
| | 3.4.4. Uptake into edible products . 44 |
| | 3.4.5. Contamination of wood. 45 |
| | 3.4.6. Expected future trends . 46 |
| | 3.4.7. Radiation exposure pathways associated with forests and forest products 46 |
| | 3.5. Radionuclides in aquatic systems . 47 |
| | 3.5.1. Introduction 47 |
| | 3.5.2. Radionuclides in surface waters 48 |
| | 3.5.2.1. Distribution of radionuclides between dissolved and particulate phases48 |
| | 3.5.2.2. Radioactivity in rivers 48 |
| | 3.5.2.3. Radioactivity in lakes and reservoirs 50 |
| | 3.5.2.4. Radionuclides in freshwater sediments 52 |
| | 3.5.3. Uptake of radionuclides to freshwater fish. 53 |
| | 3.5.3.1. Iodine-131 in freshwater fish 53 |
| | 3.5.3.2. Caesium-137 in freshwater fish and other aquatic biota 53 |
| | 3.5.3.3. Strontium-90 in freshwater fish 54 |
| | 3.5.4. Radioactivity in marine ecosystems. 55 |
| | 3.5.4.1. Distribution of radionuclides in the sea . 55 |
| | 3.5.4.2. Transfers of radionuclides to marine biota . 56 |
| | 3.5.5. Radionuclides in groundwater . 56 |
| | 3.5.5.1. Radionuclides in groundwater: Chernobyl exclusion zone56 |
| | 3.5.5.2. Radionuclides in groundwater: outside the Chernobyl exclusion zone58 |
| | 3.5.5.3. Irrigation water58 |
| | 3.5.6. Future trends . 58 |
| | 3.5.6.1. Freshwater ecosystems . 58 |
| | 3.5.6.2. Marine ecosystems . 60 |
| | 3.6. Conclusions . 60 |
| | 3.7. Further monitoring and research needed 61 |
| | References to Section 3 62 |
| | 4. ENVIRONMENTAL COUNTERMEASURES AND REMEDIATION. 69 |
| | 4.1. Radiological criteria 69 |
| | 4.1.1. International radiological criteria and standards 69 |
| | 4.1.2. National radiological criteria and standards71 |
| | 4.2. Urban decontamination. 72 |
| | 4.2.1. Decontamination research 73 |
| | 4.2.2. Chernobyl experience 73 |
| | 4.2.3. Recommended decontamination technologies . 74 |
| | 4.3. Agricultural countermeasures75 |
| | 4.3.1. Early phase . 75 |
| | 4.3.2. Late phase 77 |
| | 4.3.3. Countermeasures in intensive agricultural production . 78 |
| | 4.3.3.1. Soil treatment . 79 |
| | 4.3.3.2. Change in fodder crops grown on contaminated land80 |
| | 4.3.3.3. Clean feeding . 80 |
| | 4.3.3.4. Administration of caesium binders . 81 |
| | 4.3.4. Summary of countermeasure effectiveness in intensive production 81 |
| | 4.3.5. Countermeasures in extensive production . 81 |
| | 4.3.6. Current status of agricultural countermeasures . 83 |
| | 4.3.7. A wider perspective on remediation, including socioeconomic issues 83 |
| | 4.3.8. Current status and future of abandoned land. 84 |
| | 4.3.8.1. Exclusion and resettlement zones in Belarus . 84 |
| | 4.3.8.2. Rehabilitation of contaminated lands in Ukraine . 85 |
| | 4.3.8.3. Abandoned zones in the Russian Federation. 86 |
| | 4.4. Forest countermeasures . 86 |
| | 4.4.1. Studies on forest countermeasures . 87 |
| | 4.4.2. Countermeasures for forests contaminated with radiocaesium 87 |
| | 4.4.2.1. Management based countermeasures . 87 |
| | 4.4.2.2. Technology based countermeasures 87 |
| | 4.4.3. Examples of forest countermeasures89 |
| | 4.5. Aquatic countermeasures . 90 |
| | 4.5.1. Measures to reduce doses at the water supply and treatment stage 90 |
| | 4.5.2. Measures to reduce direct and secondary contamination of surface waters91 |
| | 4.5.3. Measures to reduce uptake by fish and aquatic foodstuffs 92 |
| | 4.5.4. Countermeasures for groundwater . 93 |
| | 4.5.5. Countermeasures for irrigation water . 93 |
| | 4.6. Conclusions and recommendations . 93 |
| | 4.6.1. Conclusions. 93 |
| | 4.6.2. Recommendations . 94 |
| | 4.6.2.1. Countries affected by the Chernobyl accident 94 |
| | 4.6.2.2. Worldwide95 |
| | 4.6.2.3. Research . 95 |
| | References to Section 4 96 |
| | 5. HUMAN EXPOSURE LEVELS . 100 |
| | 5.1. Introduction. 100 |
| | 5.1.1. Populations and areas of concern. 100 |
| | 5.1.2. Exposure pathways 100 |