| | REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON FISHERY SYSTEMS (WGFS) |
| | 2,24 | | MB |
| | 130 | | stron |
| | 3936 | | ID | International Council for the Explorations of the Sea |
| | 2006 | | rok |
| | Contents |
| | Executive summary 1 |
| | 1 Opening of the Meeting. 3 |
| | 2 Adoption of the Agenda 3 |
| | 3 Project Updates 3 |
| | 3.1 Update on EFIMAS. 3 |
| | 3.1.1 Introduction 3 |
| | 3.1.2 Status and progress of project. 5 |
| | 3.2 Update on COMMIT: Creation of Multi-annual Management Plans for Commitment 8 |
| | 3.2.1 Objective. 8 |
| | 3.2.2 Challenges and outcomes 8 |
| | 3.2.3 Methodology. 9 |
| | 3.2.4 Case studies 9 |
| | 3.2.5 Progress 9 |
| | 3.2.6 Summary. 10 |
| | 3.3 Review of TECTAC 11 |
| | 3.4 Presentation of CEVIS. 15 |
| | 3.5 PRONE (Precautionary risk methodology for fisheries) . 16 |
| | 3.6 UNCOVER – Understanding the Mechanisms of Stock Recovery . 17 |
| | 3.6.1 Project summary . 17 |
| | 3.6.2 Project objectives 18 |
| | 4 Contributed Working Papers . 20 |
| | 4.1 Changing the Nature of Fisheries Management Advice 20 |
| | 4.2 How to Improve on the Communications from Managers to Fishers in Europe and the US. 21 |
| | 4.3 Negotiation Framework for Fisheries Management: Balancing Stakeholder Interests 21 |
| | 4.4 Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) and Management Procedure (MP) Implementations in |
| | Practice: A Review of Constraints, Roles and Solutions 22 |
| | 5 Discussion of ToR b), ToR c) and the Future of the WGFS. 23 |
| | 5.1 ToR b) 23 |
| | 5.2 ToR c) 23 |
| | 5.3 Discussion of the WGFS Future 23 |
| | 6 EASE, FEMS, PKFM Informal Cluster Synthesis Report 24 |
| | 6.1 Introduction . 24 |
| | 6.2 EASE. 24 |
| | 6.2.1 Resources used for data collection and scientific advice 25 |
| | 6.2.2 Assessment performance 25 |
| | 6.2.3 Evaluation of data sampling and assessment procedures 26 |
| | 6.2.4 The developing management context . 29 |
| | 6.3 FEMS. 34 |
| | 6.3.1 Case studies 35 |
| | 6.3.2 Conclusions 37 |
| | 6.4 PKFM 38 |
| | 6.4.1 Findings in respect to stock assessment models . 38 |
| | 6.4.2 Findings in respect to institutional influences. 38 |
| | 6.4.3 Findings in respect to the policy-science interface . 39 |
| | 6.4.4 Findings in respect to the public debate 39 |
| | 6.5 Common messages from the Informal Cluster Projects (DRAFT) 40 |
| | 6.5.1 Message One: The interdependence of fisheries systems components creates both |
| | challenges and possibilities. . 40 |
| | 6.5.2 Message Two: There is a widespread desire within the management and advisory system for a |
| | more reflective and adaptive process 41 |
| | 6.5.3 Message Three: The benefits and complexity of simplicity . 42 |
| | 6.5.4 Message Four: The institutional set up for providing scientific advice for the CFP should be |
| | re-examined . 42 |
| | 7 Stakeholder Contributions 43 |
| | 7.1 Contribution from Fenneke Brocken of the Dutch Fish Product Board 43 |
| | 7.2 Contribution from Poul Degnbol of the Commission of the European Community 47 |
| | 7.3 Contribution from Magnus Eckeskog of the Fisheries Secretariat 47 |
| | 8 References 48 |
| | Annex 1: List of participants . 51 |
| | Annex 2: Agenda. 53 |
| | Annex 3: WGFS Terms of Reference 2006. 55 |
| | Annex 4: Recommendations from WGFS 56 |
| | Annex 5: The changing the nature of fisheries management advice 57 |
| | Annex 6: The PKFM Policy Brief – Penultimate Draft. 67 |
| | Annex 7: Negotiation framework for fisheries management: balancing stakeholder interests 75 |
| | Annex 8: How to Improve on the Communications from Managers to Fishers in Europe and the US. |
| | 91 |