| | Risks and Benefits of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases in |
| | 1,16 | | MB | Processes and Products under Special Consideration of the |
| | 146 | | stron | Properties Intrinsic to the Substance |
| | 4141 | | ID | Federal Environmental Agency, Germany |
| | 2004 | | rok |
| | Table of contents |
| | SUMMARY I |
| | 1 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDYI |
| | 2 METHODOLOGY II |
| | 3 PRODUCTION, APPLICATION, DISPOSAL III |
| | 4 FLUORINATED GHG IN THE ENVIRONMENT .VI |
| | 5 APPLICATION EXAMPLES.VI |
| | 6 SUMMARY AND OUTLOOKXI |
| | 1 INTRODUCTION 1 |
| | 2 DEDUCTION OF EVALUATION APPROACH. 3 |
| | 2.1 PROBLEM. 3 |
| | 2.2 BACKGROUND . 3 |
| | 2.3 MODELS OF A SUSTAINABLE SUBSTANCE POLICY 3 |
| | 2.3.1 The precautionary principle . 5 |
| | 2.3.2 Risk and Uncertainty 6 |
| | 2.4 PROCEDURE FOR THE RISK ASSESSMENT IN THIS STUDY. 7 |
| | 2.4.1 Weighting . 9 |
| | 3 MANUFACTURE, APPLICATION AND DISPOSAL 11 |
| | 3.1 LIFECYCLE. 11 |
| | 3.1.1 Overview: . 11 |
| | 3.1.2 Application 12 |
| | 3.1.3 Production 14 |
| | 3.1.4 Disposal . 17 |
| | 3.2 EMISSION PROGNOSIS 18 |
| | 3.3 SUMMARY . 21 |
| | 4 FLUORINATED GHG IN THE ENVIRONMENT . 23 |
| | 4.1 DECOMPOSITION IN THE ATMOSPHERE 23 |
| | 4.1.1 Main decomposition paths 23 |
| | 4.1.2 Destination of decomposition products. 28 |
| | 4.2 EFFECT CATEGORY ‚ENVIRONMENT’ 31 |
| | 4.2.1 Greenhouse effect 31 |
| | 4.2.2 Stratospheric decomposition of ozone. 32 |
| | 4.2.3 Photo-chemical formation of ozone 34 |
| | 4.2.4 Environmental toxicity . 35 |
| | 4.2.5 Acidification 37 |
| | 4.2.6 Eutrophication 37 |
| | 4.2.7 Use of nature space, noise and emission of radioactive isotopes . 37 |
| | 4.3 EFFECT CATEGORIES ‚MAN’ . 37 |
| | 4.3.1 Toxicity to humans. 38 |
| | 4.3.2 Flammability . 39 |
| | 4.4 DATA AVAILABILITY . 40 |
| | 4.5 SPECIFIC CONTRIBUTIONS 40 |
| | 4.6 OUTLOOK TO APPLICATION EXAMPLES . 42 |
| | 5 APPLICATION A- PU RIGID FOAM . 43 |
| | 5.1 INTRODUCTION ON THE INSULATION PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT BLOWING AGENTS |
| | 43 |
| | 5.2 PU FOAM ROOF INSULATION PANELS WITH N-PENTANE AND HFC-365MFC 44 |
| | 5.2.1 A remark on the disposal 44 |
| | 5.2.2 Modelling of the system: Aluminium-coated PU insulation panel as a reference system. 45 |
| | 5.2.3 Start data for analysis of the roof insulation panel 46 |
| | 5.2.4 Balance of the standard case for n-pentane and HFC-365 mfc 50 |
| | 5.2.5 Sensitivity analysis : CO2 balance under variation of different parameters 52 |
| | 5.2.6 Summary. 56 |
| | 5.3 INSULATION OF REFRIGERATED VEHICLES WITH CYCLOPENTANE AND HFC-365MFC 57 |
| | |
| | 5.3.1 Introduction 57 |
| | 5.3.2 Basic data for analysis refrigerated vehicles. 59 |
| | 5.3.3 Balance standard case . 63 |
| | 5.3.4 Sensitivity analysis: CO2-balance at variation of different parameters 66 |
| | 5.3.5 Summary. 73 |
| | 5.4 OUTLOOK 75 |
| | 6 APPLICATION B: SUPERMARKET REFRIGERATION (INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM) 76 |
| | 6.1 INTRODUCTION . 76 |
| | 6.1.1 Grocery 76 |
| | 6.1.2 Refrigeration systems in grocery stores 77 |
| | 6.2 REFRIGERATION TECHNOLOGY 80 |
| | 6.2.1 Choice of refrigerant 80 |
| | 6.2.2 Model technologies 81 |
| | 6.3 REFERENCE MARKET . 82 |
| | 6.4 RELEVANCE OF EMISSIONS FOR GERMANY . 84 |
| | 6.5 MODELLING. 85 |
| | 6.6 STANDARD CASE. 87 |
| | 6.7 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS 89 |
| | 6.8 SUMMARY . 92 |
| | 7 SUMMARIZING EVALUATION AND DISCUSSION. 94 |
| | 7.1 EVALUATION MATRIX FOR INTRINSIC SUBSTANCE PROPERTIES 94 |
| | 7.2 SUMMARY: INTRINSIC SUBSTANCE PROPERTIES 98 |
| | 7.3 EVALUATION IN THE APPLICATION EXAMPLES 98 |
| | 7.3.1 Application examples PU rigid foam 99 |
| | 7.3.2 Application example supermarket refrigeration 101 |
| | 7.3.3 Application examples: weighting of effect categories 105 |
| | 7.3.4 Transferability . 107 |
| | 7.4 OPEN QUESTIONS 107 |
| | 7.5 SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK. 108 |
| | 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . 110 |
| | 9 ABBREVIATIONS. 111 |
| | 10 REFERENCES. 112 |
| | 11 APPENDIX: BACKGROUND ON EVALUATION APPROACH 121 |
| | 11.1 RISK ASSESSMENT . 121 |
| | 11.1.1 Risk assessment within the framework of EU chemical substance legislation 121 |
| | 11.1.2 Terms: Risk, Uncertainty and Nescience 122 |
| | 11.1.3 Approaches to a precaution-oriented risk assessment of substances 124 |
| | 11.2 WEIGHTING OF EFFECT CATEGORIES 127 |