| | Technology Overview Using Case Studies of Alternative Landfill |
| | 0,79 | | MB | Technologies and Associated Regulatory Topics |
| | 107 | | stron |
| | 4163 | | ID | Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council |
| | 2003 | | rok |
| | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i |
| | 1. INTRODUCTION 1 |
| | 1.1 Purpose 1 |
| | 1.2 Next Steps 2 |
| | 2. RCRA-EQUIVALENT COVER DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL, |
| | COMMERCE CITY, COLORADO. 3 |
| | 2.1 Site Setting. 3 |
| | 2.2 Design Basis 4 |
| | 2.3 Design/Construction/Construction Monitoring . 13 |
| | 2.4 Operation . 13 |
| | 2.5 Postconstruction/Operation Evaluation . 14 |
| | 2.6 References. 14 |
| | 3. THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR AN ALTERNATIVE FINAL COVER SYSTEM FOR THE |
| | DENVER ARAPAHOE DISPOSAL SITE, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO 15 |
| | 3.1 Site Setting. 15 |
| | 3.2 Design Basis 15 |
| | 3.3 Design/Construction/Construction Monitoring . 23 |
| | 3.4 Operation and Montoring. 24 |
| | 3.5 Postconstruction/Operation Evaluation . 25 |
| | 4. OPERATING INDUSTRIES, INC. SUPERFUND LANDFILL. 26 |
| | 4.1 Site Setting. 26 |
| | 4.2 Design Basis 26 |
| | 4.3 Design/Construction/Construction Monitoring . 30 |
| | 4.4 Operation and Monitoring . 33 |
| | 4.5 References. 33 |
| | 5. AN ALTERNATIVE FINAL COVER ON THE MCPHERSON COUNTY LANDFILL IN KANSAS . 35 |
| | |
| | 5.1 Site Setting. 35 |
| | 5.2 Design Basis 36 |
| | 5.3 Design/Construction/Construction Monitoring . 42 |
| | 5.4 Operation and Monitoring . 43 |
| | 5.5 Postconstruction/Operation Evaluation . 44 |
| | 6. MR. “M” LANDFILL, ALTERNATIVE COVER, FERGUS COUNTY, MONTANA. 47 |
| | 6.1 Site Setting. 47 |
| | 6.2 Design Basis 47 |
| | 6.3 Design/Construction/Construction Monitoring . 54 |
| | 6.4 Operation . 56 |
| | 6.5 Postconstruction/Operation Evaluation . 57 |
| | 6.6 References. 58 |
| | 7. EVAPOTRANSPIRATION LANDFILL COVERS: DEFINITION AND CONCEPT VERIFICATION 59 |
| | |
| | 7.1 Definition . 59 |
| | 7.2 Concept Verification 60 |
| | 7.3 References with Abstracts . 60 |
| | 7.4 Additional References 62 |
| | 8. DEVELOPING AND DEMONSTRATING A PERFORMANCE-BASED APPROACH TO |
| | POSTCLOSURE CARE. 63 |
| | 8.1 Introduction. 63 |
| | 8.2 Relevance and Timeliness . 64 |
| | 8.3 Modules of Postclosure Care . 65 |
| | 8.4 Two Case Studies for Leachate Model 67 |
| | 8.5 Summary 68 |
| | 8.6 Figures . 69 |
| | 9. SUMMARY FOR SITES IN THE EPA ALTERNATIVE COVER ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 81 |
| | 9.1 Site Setting. 81 |
| | 9.2 Design Basis 81 |
| | 9.3 Design/Construction/Construction Monitoring . 92 |
| | 9.4 Operation and Monitoring . 93 |
| | 9.5 Postconstruction/Operation Evaluation . 94 |