| | Surrey Household Waste Study |
| | 0,78 | | MB |
| | 127 | | stron |
| | 4252 | | ID | M.E.L Research & Service |
| | 2004 | | rok |
| | Contents |
| | Quality guarantee.i |
| | 1.1 Background. 1 |
| | 1.2 Recycling targets 1 |
| | 1.3 Biodegradable waste 2 |
| | 1.4 The Animal By-Products Regulation 3 |
| | 1.5 Recycling and waste management in Surrey 4 |
| | 1.6 Waste analysis 4 |
| | 1.7 The general method . 5 |
| | 2.1 Sampling . 6 |
| | 2.2 Collection method. 9 |
| | 2.3 Proximate analysis and categorisation 9 |
| | 3.1 Calculation method. 14 |
| | 3.2 October results 14 |
| | Materials put out for recycling .14 |
| | Residual waste.15 |
| | Primary categories.18 |
| | 3.3 February results 23 |
| | Materials put out for recycling .23 |
| | Residual waste.23 |
| | Table 3.8: Surrey average residual waste February 2003.25 |
| | Primary categories.26 |
| | Primary categories.26 |
| | 4.1 Variation of generation rates and composition 31 |
| | Acorn A ‘thriving’ 31 |
| | Acorn B ‘expanding’.36 |
| | Acorn C ‘rising’.38 |
| | Acorn D ‘settling’ households40 |
| | Acorn E ‘aspiring’.46 |
| | Acorn F ‘striving’.47 |
| | Surrey average 55 |
| | 5.1 Biodegradable content of the total household waste stream . 58 |
| | 5.2 Biodegradable content of collected household waste 58 |
| | Appendix 1 Full results from the October 2002 campaign |
| | Appendix 2 Full results from the February 2003 campaign |