| | TEXACO GASIFICATION PROCESS - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY |
| | 0,93 | | MB | EVALUATION REPORT |
| | 90 | | stron |
| | 4291 | | ID | National Risk Management Research Laboratory |
| | 2000 | | rok |
| | CONTENTS |
| | Notice . |
| | Figures . |
| | Tables . . |
| | List of Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Symbols . . |
| | Conversion Factors . . |
| | Acknowledgements . |
| | Executive Summary . 1 |
| | 1 Introduction . . |
| | 1 .1 Background |
| | 1.2 Brief Description of Program and Reports . |
| | 1.3 Purpose of the Innovative Technology Evaluation Report (ITER) . |
| | 1.4 Technology Description |
| | 1.5 Key Contacts |
| | 2 Technology Applications Analysis . . |
| | 2.1 Objectives - Performances versus ARARs |
| | 2.1.1 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Actt . |
| | 2.1.2 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act . |
| | 2.1.3 Clean Air Act |
| | 2.1.4 Safe Drinking Water Act . |
| | 2.15 Clean Water Act . |
| | 2.1.6 Toxic Substances Control Act . |
| | 2.1.7 Occupational Safety and Health Administration Requirements . |
| | 2.2 Operability of the Technology . |
| | 2.3 Applicable Wastes . |
| | 2.4 Key Features |
| | 2.5 Availability and Transportability of Equipment ’. |
| | 2.6 Materials Handling Requirements . |
| | 2.7 Site Support Requirements . |
| | 2.8 Limitations of the Technology . |
| | 3 Economic Analysis . |
| | 3.1 Conclusion of Economic Analysis . |
| | 3.2 Basis of Economic Analysis |
| | 3.3 Issues and Assumptions . |
| | 3.4 Results . |
| | 3.4.1 Site Preparation Costs |
| | 3.4.2 Permitting and Regulatory Requirements . |
| | 3.4.3 Capital Equipment |
| | 3.4.4 Startup . |
| | 3.4.5 Labor . |
| | 3.4.6 Consumables and Supplies . . |
| | 3.4.7 Utilities . |
| | 3.4.8 Effluent Treatment and Disposal |
| | 3.4.9 Residual Waste Shipping and Handling . . |
| | 3.4.10 Analytical Services . |
| | 3.4.11 Maintenance and Modifications . . |
| | 3.4.12 Demobilization |
| | DRE . . |
| | Slag and Solid Residuals Leachability |
| | 4.3.1 Test Slurry Leaching Characteristics . . |
| | 4.3.2 SITE Demonstration Results . |
| | Synthesis Gas Produsct . . |
| | 4.4.1 Synthesis Gas Composition . |
| | 4.4.2 Products of Incomplete Reaction (PIRs) |
| | 4.4.3 Particulate Emissions . |
| | 4.4.4 Acid Gas Removal |
| | Metals Partitioning |
| | Process Wastewater . . |
| | Other Technology Requirements . |
| | 5.1 Environmental Regulation Requirements . |
| | 5.2 Personnellssues . |
| | 5.3 Community Acceptance . |
| | Technology Statuss . |
| | 6.1 Petroleum Production Tank Bottoms Demonstration |
| | 6.2 El Dorado, Kansas Refinery Project . |
| | Appendices |
| | I Vendor Claims . 72 |
| | II Case Studies . 78 |