| | SYNTHESIS OF POLY(DL-LACTIDE-CO-GLYCOLIDE) |
| | 3,11 | | MB | NANOPARTICLES WITH ENTRAPPED MAGNETITE |
| | 160 | | stron |
| | 4306 | | ID | Louisiana State University |
| | 2006 | | rok |
| | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. iii |
| | LIST OF TABLES vii |
| | LIST OF FIGURES . viii |
| | ABSTRACT. x |
| | CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 |
| | 1.1. Method Selection 2 |
| | 1.2. Materials Selection 3 |
| | 1.2.1. Polymer (PLGA). 3 |
| | 1.2.2. Solvent (Ethyl Acetate). 4 |
| | 1.2.3. Surfactant (SDS) . 4 |
| | 1.3. Processing Parameters 5 |
| | 1.4. References. 5 |
| | CHAPTER 2 SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF PLGA NANOPARTICLES AND |
| | MAGNETIC POLYMERIC NANOPARTICLES: A REVIEW. 8 |
| | 2.1. Introduction. 8 |
| | 2.2. Synthesis of PLGA Nanoparticles 9 |
| | 2.2.1. Emulsion Diffusion Method . 9 |
| | 2.2.2. Salting Out Method. 16 |
| | 2.2.3. Nanoprecipitation (Solvent Diffusion, or Solvent Displacement) Method 19 |
| | 2.2.4. Emulsion Evaporation Method . 25 |
| | 2.2.4.1. Oil in Water Emulsion Method (Single Emulsion).27 |
| | 2.2.4.2. Double Emulsion (w/o/w) Method .32 |
| | 2.2.5. Important Modifications of Traditional Methods . 36 |
| | 2.2.5.1. Membrane Emulsion Evaporation Method.37 |
| | 2.2.5.2. Spray Dry Method for Water in Oil37 |
| | 2.2.5.3. Spryer Solvent Displacement with Dialysis and Freeze Dryer Stabilization37 |
| | 2.2.5.4. Double Emulsion with Emulsion Diffusion38 |
| | 2.2.5.5. Dialysis Method for Modified PLGA.39 |
| | 2.3. Magnetic Polymeric Nanoparticles (MPNPs). 41 |
| | 2.3.1. Polymerization Methods . 41 |
| | 2.3.2. Chemical and Physical Entrapment of Magnetite. 48 |
| | 2.3.2.1. Chemical Entrapment and Surface Modification of Magnetite: .48 |
| | 2.3.2.2. Physical Entrapment .48 |
| | 2.3.3. Surface Modification 49 |
| | 2.4. Characterization 50 |
| | 2.4.1. Morphology. 50 |
| | 2.4.2. Size and Size Distribution. 51 |
| | 2.4.3. Surface Properties . 51 |
| | 2.4.4. Active Component Entrapment. 52 |
| | 2.4.5. Other Techniques 52 |
| | 2.5. Conclusions. 53 |
| | 2.6. References. 54 |
| | CHAPTER 3. SYNTHESIS OF POLY(DL-LACTIDE-CO-GLYCOLIDE) NANOPARTICLES WITH |
| | ENTRAPPED MAGNETITE 68 |
| | 3.1. Introduction. 68 |
| | 3.2. Objectives . 69 |
| | 3.3. Materials and Methods 69 |
| | 3.3.1. Materials . 69 |
| | 3.3.2. Nanoparticles Preparation. 70 |
| | 3.3.2.1. Hydrophobic Magnetite 70 |
| | 3.3.2.2. Single Emulsion Evaporation with Hydrophobic Magnetite 70 |
| | 3.3.3. Nanoparticles Characterization. 71 |
| | 3.3.3.1. Morphology and Size71 |
| | 3.3.3.2. Size and Zeta Potential71 |
| | 3.3.3.3. Colorimetric Method for Iron Content71 |
| | 3.3.3.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis 72 |
| | 3.3.3.5. Statistical Analysis72 |
| | 3.4. Results and Discussions 72 |
| | 3.4.1. Single Emulsion Evaporation with Hydrophobic Magnetite 72 |
| | 3.4.1.1. Morphology and Magnetite Distribution into the Polymeric Matrix 72 |
| | 3.4.1.2. The Effect of Synthesis Parameters on Nanoparticle Physical Characteristics 76 |
| | 3.4.1.3. Yield of Nanoparticles, Entrapment Efficiency of MOA, Remaining SDS, and Oleic Acid |
| | Amount over Magnetite .84 |
| | 3.5. Conclusions. 87 |
| | 3.6. References. 87 |
| | CHAPTER 4. CONCLUSIONS. 90 |
| | CHAPTER 5. FUTURE WORK 91 |
| | APPENDIX |
| | A.AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRODUCTIONS. 93 |
| | B.STANDARD CURVE FOR IRON DETECTION 101 |
| | C.SIZE MEASUREMENTS WITH DLS (MALVERN ZETASIZER NANOSERIES) 102 |
| | D.STATISTICS ANALYSIS OF DATA . 126 |
| | VITA 150 |