| | REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH RENEWABLE ENERGY |
| | 0,97 | | MB | OBLIGATION SUPPORT MECHANISMS |
| | 71 | | stron |
| | 4400 | | ID | Lund University |
| | 2005 | | rok |
| | CONTENTS |
| | Summary 6 |
| | 1 Background 9 |
| | 2 Overview of renewable energy policy support instruments 10 |
| | 2.1 Main policy support instruments 10 |
| | 2.1.1 The quota obligation scheme 10 |
| | 2.1.2 The feed-in tariff scheme 11 |
| | 2.1.3 The tendering scheme 11 |
| | 2.2 Other accompanying measures 12 |
| | 2.3 Cost effectiveness of obligation system compared to feed-in tariff 12 |
| | 3 Current applications of obligation schemes 16 |
| | 3.1 Overview of applications 16 |
| | 3.2 Key elements of existing obligation systems 19 |
| | 3.3 Criteria for evaluating the performance of obligation schemes 23 |
| | 4 Experience in the UK 24 |
| | 4.1 Introduction 24 |
| | 4.2 Evaluation of the performance of the obligation scheme 26 |
| | 4.2.1 Effectiveness 26 |
| | 4.2.2 Market efficiency 28 |
| | 4.2.3 Certainty for the renewable energy industry 29 |
| | 4.2.4 Cost effectiveness 30 |
| | 4.2.5 Stakeholder support for the system 30 |
| | 4.2.6 Equity 31 |
| | 4.2.7 Other key issues 31 |
| | 4.3 Conclusions and lessons learnt 32 |
| | 5 Experience in Sweden 34 |
| | 5.1 Introduction 34 |
| | 5.2 Evaluation of the performance of the obligation scheme 34 |
| | 5.2.1 Effectiveness 35 |
| | 5.2.2 Market efficiency 36 |
| | 5.2.3 Certainty for the renewable energy industry 37 |
| | 5.2.4 Cost effectiveness 38 |
| | 5.2.5 Stakeholder support for the system 39 |
| | 5.2.6 Equity 40 |
| | 5.3 Other key issues 41 |
| | 5.4 Conclusions and lessons learnt 43 |
| | 6 Experience in the U.S.A 45 |
| | 6.1 Introduction 45 |
| | 6.2 Evaluation of the performance of the obligation scheme 45 |
| | 6.2.1 Effectiveness 45 |
| | 6.2.2 Market efficiency 47 |
| | 6.2.3 Certainty for the renewable energy industry 48 |
| | 6.2.4 Cost effectiveness 49 |
| | 6.2.5 Stakeholder support for the system 50 |
| | 6.3 Equity 50 |
| | 6.4 Conclusions and lessons learnt 51 ECN-C--05-025 3 |
| | 7 Conclusions 53 |
| | 7.1 Main results and conclusions for each criterion 53 |
| | 7.1.1 Effectiveness 53 |
| | 7.1.2 Market efficiency 54 |
| | 7.1.3 Certainty for the renewable energy industry 55 |
| | 7.1.4 Cost effectiveness 56 |
| | 7.1.5 Stakeholder support for the obligation system 57 |
| | 7.1.6 Equity 58 |
| | 7.2 Recommendations on the design of a quota obligation 59 |
| | 7.3 Feasibility of introducing a quota obligation system in the Netherlands 60 |
| | 7.4 Finally: convergence of different support schemes? 61 |
| | References 62 |
| | Summary in Dutch 64 |
| | S.1 Wat is een verplichtingssysteem? 64 |
| | S.2 Ervaringen met verplichtingssystemen 65 |
| | S.3 Conclusies van de evaluatie 66 |
| | S.3.1 Effectiviteit: zorgt het systeem voor een groei in de elektriciteit opgewekt met hernieuwbare |
| | bronnen? 66 |
| | S.3.2 Werkt de groencertificatenmarkt efficiënt? 66 |
| | S.3.3 Biedt een verplicht aandeel voldoende zekerheid voor producenten? 67 |
| | S.3.4 Is een verplicht aandeel kosten effectief? 67 |
| | S.3.5. Steun van marktpartijen voor het verplichtingssysteem 69 |
| | S.3.6 Eerlijke verdeling van kosten en baten over de belangengroepen 69 |
| | S.4 Hoe ziet een goed ontworpen verplichtingssysteem eruit? 69 |
| | S.5 Is een verplichtingssysteem geschikt voor Nederland? 70 |
| | S.6 Tenslotte: systemen kunnen convergeren 71 4 ECN-C--05-025 |