| | MICROTURBINES AND THEIR APPLICATION IN BIO-ENERGY |
| | 1,49 | | MB |
| | 76 | | stron |
| | 4481 | | ID | CENTRE FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES |
| | 2004 | | rok |
| | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | 1. INTRODUCTION . 2 |
| | 2. DEFINITION OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND SMALL SCALE CHP 3 |
| | 3. DEFINITION OF A MICROTURBINE 6 |
| | 4. BIOENERGY SPECIFICITIES. 12 |
| | 4.1. Biomass basics . 12 |
| | 4.2. Biopower technologies. 13 |
| | 4.3. Firing gas turbines with biomass derived fuels 15 |
| | 4.4. Firing micro-gas turbines with biomass derived fuels . 17 |
| | 5. MAJOR MICROTURBINE MANUFACTURERS 18 |
| | 5.1. Turbec . 18 |
| | 5.2. Bowman Power 21 |
| | 5.3. Other European Manufacturers 24 |
| | 5.4. Capstone 24 |
| | 5.5. Ingersoll Rand 26 |
| | 5.6. Elliot Energy Systems 27 |
| | 6. CURRENT R&D ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING EC PROJECTS 29 |
| | 6.1. OMES project 30 |
| | 6.2. CHEP project . 32 |
| | 6.3. MICRO-TRIGEN. 35 |
| | 6.4. CAME-GT . 37 |
| | 6.5. Externally fired biomass-driven gas turbine 39 |
| | 6.6. Further EU and US R&D activities 40 |
| | 7. CASE STUDIES. 45 |
| | 7.1. Turbec T100 running on sewage treatment gas, Kilmington, UK [Burgess, 2003] 45 |
| | 7.2. Mariestad sewage treatment plant , OMES EC project [Noren 2003]. 48 |
| | 7.3. US Case studies 49 |
| | 8. MARKET POTENTIAL OF MICROTURBINES 52 |
| | 8.1. Market potential of cogeneration . 52 |
| | 8.2. Market potential of biomass cogeneration . 54 |
| | 8.3. Drivers & Barriers to biomass cogeneration 57 |
| | 8.4. Market potential of microturbines 58 |
| | 8.5. SWOT analysis for biomass driven microturbines 61 |
| | 9. CONCLUSIONS. 65 |
| | 10. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.67 |
| | 11. REFERENCES 68 |
| | 12. ANNEX. 72 |