| | A Verification and Transparency Concept for Technology |
| | 0,51 | | MB | Transfers under the BTWC |
| | 49 | | stron |
| | 4551 | | ID | BioWeapons Prevention Project |
| | 2005 | | rok |
| | Table of contents |
| | Introduction 1 |
| | Supply and demand side in technology transfer controls . 3 |
| | The demand side in biological armament . 6 |
| | Assimilation and its implications . 9 |
| | The demand side perspective of the proliferation process . 10 |
| | The armament dynamic: overview of the process and its implications . 12 |
| | Application of the assimilation model to non-state entities 15 |
| | The armament dynamic and supply-side non-proliferation policies 21 |
| | The ‘dual-use’ concept 24 |
| | Towards an understanding of dual-use technology transfers . 25 |
| | The understanding of ‘dual-use’ technology transfers under the BTWC . 26 |
| | The organization of transparency 28 |
| | The accreditation process 28 |
| | International organization 30 |
| | Establishing accreditation criteria . 30 |
| | Monitoring of transfer flows . 31 |
| | Analysis and evaluation . 31 |
| | Inspectorate 31 |
| | National implementation assistance . 32 |
| | National authority 32 |
| | The generation of transparency . 33 |
| | Technology transfer flows . 34 |
| | Conclusion 37 |
| | Notes 39 |