| | The Use of Nuclear and Isotopic Applications to Address |
| | 0,24 | | MB | Specific Coastal Zone Management Problems |
| | 67 | | stron |
| | 4674 | | ID | International Atomic Energy Agency |
| | 2005 | | rok |
| | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 |
| | 1.0 DEVELOPMENT NEED 7 |
| | 1.1 PROBLEM CHALLENGES. 7 |
| | 1.2 RATIONALE FOR THEMATIC PLANNING. 7 |
| | 2.0 SETTING THE CONTEXT FOR CZM 8 |
| | 2.1 ISSUES 8 |
| | 2.2 GENERAL TRENDS. 11 |
| | 2.3 CURRENT RESPONSES (PROGRAMMES, INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS ETC.) 11 |
| | 2.4 LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. 14 |
| | 2.4.1 GENERAL . 14 |
| | 2.4.2 HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS (HABS) 14 |
| | 2.4.3 OTHER COASTAL ZONE PROBLEMS 15 |
| | 3.0 STRATEGIC ROLE OF NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY. 16 |
| | 3.1 HABS-RELATED DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS. 16 |
| | 3.1.1 PARALYTIC SHELLFISH POISONING 16 |
| | 3.1.2 A ROLE FOR NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY IN PSP MONITORING AND FOOD SAFETY . 17 |
| | 3.2 OTHER CZM ISSUES 18 |
| | 3.2.1 PUBLIC HEALTH: RADIO-ISOTOPE METHODS FOR STUDYING CONTAMINANT |
| | BIOGEOCHEMISTRY . 19 |
| | 3.2.2 ECOSYSTEM HEALTH . 21 |
| | 3.2.4 NON-LIVING RESOURCES 25 |
| | 3.2.5 HAZARDS . 29 |
| | 4.0 ROLE OF IAEA 30 |
| | 4.1 THE IAEA COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES 30 |
| | 4.2 LIMITATIONS, CONSTRAINTS AND RISKS FOR THE IAEA. 31 |
| | 4.3 PARTNERSHIPS. 32 |
| | 4.3.1 UN AGENCIES AND ICZM 32 |
| | 4.3.2 BILATERAL AND REGIONAL PARTNERS 34 |
| | 4.3.3 NATIONAL LEVEL. 34 |
| | 4.3.4 NGOS 34 |
| | 5.0 PROGRAMME STRATEGY 35 |
| | 5.1 PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES 35 |
| | 5.2 TIME FRAME FOR THE 2003-04 TC PROGRAMME. 35 |
| | 5.3 PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK: PILOT ACTIVITIES, FEASIBILITY, ENABLING |
| | ENVIRONMENT, AND ASSESSMENTS. 36 |
| | 5.4 PROGRAMME STRATEGY FOR HABS 37 |
| | 5.4.1 AN OUTSTANDING OPPORTUNITY FOR TRANSFER OF NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY 37 |
| | 5.4.2 HAB PROGRAMME COMPONENTS: IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY . 38 |
| | 5.4.3 RATIONALE 39 |
| | 5.4.4 PROJECT FRAMEWORK AND DESIGN. 39 |
| | 5.4.5 NECESSARY INFRASTRUCTURE AND CAPABILITIES 40 |
| | 5.4.6 POTENTIAL PILOT ACTIVITIES . 41 |
| | 5.4.7 ENABLING ENVIRONMENT FOR TRANSFERRING THE RBA TECHNOLOGY 42 |
| | 5.4.8 INTER-LABORATORY VALIDATION TRIAL TO OBTAIN AOAC CERTIFICATION OF THE |
| | RBA METHOD FOR PSP TOXINS. 42 |
| | 5.4.9 RELIABLE AND SUSTAINED SUPPLY OF SAXITOXIN STANDARD AND RADIO-LABELED |
| | SAXITOXIN (OR ITS ANALOGUES) . 43 |
| | 5.4.10 ROBUST RBA ASSAY KITS FOR USE IN REMOTE LOCATIONS . 45 |
| | 5.4.11 FUTURE PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS . 49 |
| | 5.4.12 FURTHER ASSESSMENTS . 49 |
| | 5.4.13 PARTNERSHIPS . 49 |
| | 5.4.14 STAFFING AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS 50 |
| | 5.5 OTHER COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS 50 |
| | 5.6 PROGRAMME COMPONENT: FEASIBILITY/ PILOT ACTIVITIES WITH REGIONAL CZM |
| | PROGRAMMES. 52 |
| | 5.7 SELECTION CRITERIA FOR FEASIBILITY/PILOT STUDIES 52 |
| | 5.8 PROPOSED FEASIBILITY STUDIES . 53 |
| | 5.8.1 SUSTAINABILITY OF LIVING MARINE RESOURCES: BENGUELA CURRENT LARGE |
| | MARINE ECOSYSTEM 53 |
| | 5.8.2 MANAGING AND SUSTAINING MARICULTURE ACTIVITIES: THE EAST ASIA SEAS |
| | PROGRAMME 55 |
| | 5.8.3 EUTROPHICATION AND CONTAMINATION IN THE COASTAL REGIONS OF CENTRAL |
| | AMERICA 55 |
| | 5.4.18 FURTHER RESEARCH 57 |
| | 5.4.19 RESOURCE NEEDS 57 |
| | 5.4.20 PARTNERSHIPS: MAKING THE LINK BETWEEN TC AND ICZM EFFORTS . 57 |
| | 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS. 58 |
| | 6.1. HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS 58 |
| | 6.2. IMMEDIATE FOLLOW-UP AND MEDIUM TERM STEPS (2002-2004) . 58 |
| | 6.2.1. PILOT ACTIVITIES/FEASIBILITY/ ASSESSMENTS 58 |
| | 6.2.2. ENHANCING THE ENABLING ENVIRONMENT 58 |
| | 6.2.3. PARTNERSHIPS AND OUTREACH 59 |
| | ANNEX 1: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 3 |
| | ANNEX 2: COMPONENTS OF A TYPICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY |