| | Potential of thorium based fuel cycles to constrain plutonium |
| | 2,12 | | MB | and reduce long lived waste toxicity |
| | 139 | | stron |
| | 4691 | | ID | International Atomic Energy Agency |
| | 2003 | | rok |
| | CONTENTS |
| | 1. INTRODUCTION 1 |
| | 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS. 2 |
| | 2.1. Comparison of methods and basic nuclear data. 2 |
| | 2.1.1. Cell burnup calculations 2 |
| | 2.1.2. Lattice calculations for LWR. 9 |
| | 2.2. Evaluation of the potential of LWRs, HTRs, HWRs and MSRs for plutonium incineration. 14 |
| | 2.2.1. Incentives. 14 |
| | 2.2.2. Results 15 |
| | 2.2.3. Conclusions 16 |
| | 2.3. Effect of plutonium incineration on the toxicity of disposed nuclear waste . 18 |
| | 2.3.1. Incentives and database . 18 |
| | 2.3.2. Toxicity benchmark. 18 |
| | 2.3.3. Possible reduction of the radio-waste toxicity. 22 |
| | 2.3.4. Results and conclusions. 23 |
| | 2.4. Conclusions 26 |
| | References to Section 2 27 |
| | 3. INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE VARIOUS COUNTRIES 28 |
| | 3.1. China 28 |
| | 3.1.1. Study of thorium fuel cycles burning weapons grad and civil grade plutonium in the Module- |
| | HTR 28 |
| | 3.1.2. Physics studies of energy production and plutonium burning in pebble-bed type high |
| | temperature gas cooled module reactor 32 |
| | References to Section 3.1 35 |
| | 3.2. Germany. 36 |
| | 3.2.1. Introduction 36 |
| | 3.2.2. Optimization of plutonium incineration in the modular HTR . 36 |
| | 3.2.3. Effect of plutonium incineration on the long lived waste toxicity 45 |
| | 3.2.4. Summary and conclusions . 48 |
| | References to Section 3.2 49 |
| | 3.3. India . 50 |
| | 3.3.1. Introduction 50 |
| | 3.3.2. Benchmarks . 50 |
| | 3.3.3. Evaluation of the potential of HWRs for plutonium incineration . 51 |
| | 3.3.4. Assessment of the effect of plutonium incineration on waste toxicity 52 |
| | 3.3.5. Details of reactor calculations for plutonium burner (PHWR) 61 |
| | 3.4. Israel and the USA. 66 |
| | 3.4.1. Introduction 66 |
| | 3.4.2. Toxicity calculations 73 |
| | References to Section 3.4 78 |
| | 3.5. Japan 79 |
| | 3.5.1. Introduction 79 |
| | 3.5.2. Reactor model 79 |
| | 3.5.3. Calculation of fuel depletion . 80 |
| | 3.5.4. Calculation of toxicity . 81 |
| | 3.5.5. Conclusion . 82 |
| | References to Section 3.5 91 |
| | 3.6. Republic of Korea 92 |
| | 3.6.1. Potential of a thorium based fuel cycle for 900 MW(e) PWR core to incinerate plutonium. 92 |
| | 3.6.2. Assessment of the effect of plutonium incineration on the long lived waste toxicity 101 |
| | References to Section 3.6 105 |
| | 3.7. Russian Federation. 106 |
| | 3.7.1. Calculations on the principal neutronics characteristics of the WWER-1000 reactor loaded |
| | with PuO2–ThO2 fuel based on weapons grade plutonium. 106 |
| | 3.7.2. Calculations of the principal neutronics characteristics of the WWER-1000 reactor loaded with |
| | PuO2–ThO2 fuel based on reactor grade plutonium . 116 |
| | 3.7.3. Assessment of the effect of plutonium burning on the waste toxicity. 120 |
| | References to Section 3.7 122 |
| | 3.8. Netherlands 123 |
| | 3.8.1. Introduction 123 |
| | 3.8.2. Calculation method 123 |
| | 3.8.3. Results of the benchmark calculation 124 |
| | 3.8.4. Numerical results of the benchmark 128 |
| | References to Section 3.8 131 |
| | PARTICIPANTS IN THE CO-ORDINATED RESEARCH PROJECT. 133 |