| | NUCLEAR ENERGY PLANT DESIGN PROJECT: The Environmental |
| | 0,66 | | MB | and Economic Challenge |
| | 56 | | stron |
| | 4707 | | ID | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| | 2000 | | rok |
| | Table of Contents |
| | List of Figures v |
| | List of Tables v |
| | 1. Introduction 1 |
| | 2. Executive Summary 4 |
| | 3. Assessment of the Issues and Needs for a New Plant 8 |
| | 4. Reactor Design Options 11 |
| | 4.1 AP600 11 |
| | 4.2 System 80+ 13 |
| | 4.3 Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) 14 |
| | 4.4 High Temperature Gas Reactor. 15 |
| | 4.5 Other Options Reviewed 18 |
| | 4.5.1 Lead Bismuth Reactors 18 |
| | 4.5.2 Thorium Breeder . 18 |
| | 4.5.3 Liquid Metal Breeder Reactor 18 |
| | 5. Evaluation Process Used to Select Design Type to be Developed . 19 |
| | 5.1 Summary of Decision Criteria 19 |
| | 5.1.1 Safety: HTGR, AP600, ALWR 19 |
| | 5.1.2 Economics: AP600, ALWR, HTGR. 19 |
| | 5.1.3 Payback: AP600, HTGR, ALWR. 20 |
| | 5.1.4 Government Support: HTGR, AP600, ALWR . 20 |
| | 5.1.5 Local Support: HTGR, AP600, ALWR 20 |
| | 5.1.6 Construction Time: AP600, HTGR, ALWR. 20 |
| | 5.1.7 Modularity: AP600, HTGR, ALWR 20 |
| | 5.1.8 High Efficiency: HTGR, AP600, ALWR. 21 |
| | 5.1.9 Regulatory Transparency: HTGR, AP600, ALWR. 21 |
| | 5.1.10 Fuel Integrity: HTGR, AP600, ALWR. 21 |
| | 5.1.11 Staff Size: HTGR, AP600, ALWR. 21 |
| | 5.1.12 Low Level Waste output: HTGR, AP600, ALWR 21 |
| | 5.1.13 Refueling Time: HTGR, AP600, ALWR 21 |
| | 5.1.14 Burn Up: HTGR, AP600, ALWR 21 |
| | 5.1.15 Operating Cycle Length: HTGR, ALWR, AP600. 22 |
| | 5.1.16 Decommissioning: AP600, HTGR, ALWR 22 |
| | 5.1.17 Proliferation: HTGR, AP600, ALWR 22 |
| | 5.1.18 Ease of Replacement: AP600, HTGR, ALWR . 22 |
| | 5.1.19 Simple Design: HTGR, AP600, ALWR . 22 |
| | 5.1.20 Once Through Fuel Cycle: HTGR, ALWR, AP600 22 |
| | 5.1.21 Life of Plant: AP600, ALWR, HTGR 22 |
| | 5.1.22 Electrical Conversion: HTGR, AP600, ALWR 23 |
| | 5.1.23 Spent Fuel: HTGR, AP600, ALWR . 23 |
| | 5.1.24 Contamination: HTGR, AP600, ALWR. 23 |
| | 5.1.25 Production line capability: HTGR, AP600, ALWR 23 |
| | 5.1.26 Other considerations that have equal weight across all designs: 23 |
| | 5.2 Conclusions 23 |
| | 6. Conceptual Description of Reactor Plant Design 26 |
| | 6.1 General Plant Overview 26 |
| | 6.2 Indirect Cycle Plant 29 |
| | 6.3 Direct Cycle Plant 29 |
| | 6.4 "Naturally Safe" By Fuel Design 31 |
| | 6.5 Modularity and Construction 32 |
| | 7. Economic Analysis 33 |
| | 7.1 Introduction. 33 |
| | 7.2 Cost Estimate Ground Rules. 33 |
| | 7.3 Cost Estimates 34 |
| | 7.3.1 Capital Cost . 34 |
| | 7.3.2 Operating and Maintenance Costs 34 |
| | 7.3.3 Fuel Cost . 35 |
| | 7.3.4 Decommissioning Cost 35 |
| | 7.3.5 Total Generation Cost 35 |
| | 7.4 Comparison with Alternatives 36 |
| | 8. Financing Construction 38 |
| | 8.1 Concept of Cost of Capital . 38 |
| | 8.2 Financial Parameters 39 |
| | 8.2.1 Analysis of Annual Revenue Requirements . 39 |
| | 8.2.1.1 Calculation of 15 Year Amortization Annual Revenue Requirements. 41 |
| | 8.2.1.2 Calculation of 30 Year Amortization Annual Revenue Requirements. 42 |
| | 8.2.1.3 Consortium Approach 42 |
| | 8.3 Generation of Revenues to Cover Debt Service 43 |
| | 8.4 Optimal Capital Structure . 44 |
| | 8.5 Concerns Associated with Investments and Financing in Maturing Technologies . 45 |
| | 8.6 Less-Than-Expected Efficiency of Commercial Operation . 45 |
| | 8.7 The Issue of Safety. 46 |
| | 8.8 Project Non-Completions . 46 |
| | 8.9 Conclusions 46 |
| | 9. Has The Challenge Been Met? . 47 |
| | 9.1 Unique Features of Design That Will Make The Pebble Bed HTGR Desirable . 47 |
| | 10. Conclusions . 50 |
| | Appendix A: Guest Lecturers 51 |