| | BIOINDICATORS AS A MEASURE OF SUCCESS FOR VIRTUAL |
| | 5,44 | | MB | ELIMINATION OF PERSISTENT TOXIC SUBITANCES |
| | 45 | | stron |
| | 4869 | | ID | Canadian Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Research Centre |
| | 2003 | | rok |
| | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
| | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
| | INTRODUCTION |
| | Background |
| | Theory |
| | The Need for Indicators |
| | BIOINDICATORS |
| | SELECTION CRITERIA |
| | Specificity (Sensitivity) to Persistent Toxic Substances |
| | Placement in Appropriate Scales |
| | Ease and Cost of Measurement |
| | Social Relevance/Public Perception |
| | CAUSE-EFFECT ASSOCIATIONS |
| | BIOINDICATORS: BIOCHEMICAL AND Biochemical Markers |
| | Biological Effects |
| | Indicator olr Sentinel Species |
| | BIOLOGICAL MEASURES OF EXPOSURE AND EFFECT |
| | CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | Components of a Virtual Elimination Biornonitoring Program |
| | Data and Program Needs |
| | Research Needs |
| | REFERENCES 29 |
| | DEFINITIONS AND GLOSSARY 34 |
| | WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS 35 |
| | REVIEWERS OF DRAFT REPORT DISTRIBUTED SEPTEMBER 1992 37 |