| | Carbon Disclosure Project |
| | 1,17 | | MB |
| | 48 | | stron |
| | 4970 | | ID | Carbon Disclosure Project |
| | 2005 | | rok |
| | Contents |
| | 1. Background to the CDP 2 |
| | 2. The Climate Leadership Index 2005 6 |
| | 3. Critical Changes Affecting Investors Since CDP2 10 |
| | Kyoto Protocol Ratification Focuses World Attention 12 |
| | Sea-Change Noticeable in Corporate 12 |
| | Positioning on Climate Change |
| | The Carbon Markets Advance 12 |
| | Investor Collaboration on the Rise 13 |
| | The Current State of Climate Science 13 |
| | Accounting Organizations Move to Codify Carbon Accounting & Disclosure Rules 14 |
| | Climate Change Litigation Continues Its Slow March 14 |
| | 4. Analysis of CDP3 Responses 16 |
| | Response Rates Rise Again, From 59% in CDP2 to 71% in CDP3 17 |
| | Awareness Rises... But Actions Lag 19 |
| | “Carbon Beta©” Varies Widely But Only Some Companies Are Ahead of the Curve 19 |
| | Carbon: $5 or $20? How the Cost of Carbon Plays Out Under Different Scenarios 24 |
| | Measuring Emissions Intensity 27 |
| | Differences of Opinion Persist on Business Relevance of Climate Change 27 |
| | Percentage of Non-respondent’s 29 |
| | Common Shares Owned by CDP3 Signatories |
| | Only Modest Responsiveness to Investor Calls for Quantitative Disclosure 30 |
| | Other Themes Discussed in the Online Report 31 |
| | Conclusion: The Way Forward 31 |
| | 5. Appendices 32 |
| | Appendix A. Comparative Company Analysis By Sector 33 |
| | Appendix B: CDP Questionnaire 38 |
| | Acknowledgements 39 |