| | Pollution abatement and control expenditure in OECD countries |
| | 0,97 | | MB |
| | 131 | | stron |
| | 4985 | | ID | Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development |
| | 2003 | | rok |
| | Table of contents |
| | FOREWORD 1 |
| | PART 1. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY 7 |
| | - INTRODUCTION 8 |
| | - PAC EXPENDITURE: CONCEPT AND METHODOLOGY 9 |
| | Definitions 9 |
| | Conceptual issues 10 |
| | Dimensions of PAC and other EP expenditure 12 |
| | - INTERPRETATION, USE AND LIMITS 15 |
| | PART 2. SUMMARY TABLES 31 |
| | Table 1: Total PAC expenditure as a % of GDPa,b 32 |
| | Table 1a: PAC expenditure by the public sector as a % of GDPa,b 33 |
| | Table 1b: PAC expenditure by the business sector as a % of GDPa,b 34 |
| | Memorandum item (1.c): PAC expenditure by specialised producers as a % of GDPa,b 35 |
| | Table 2: PAC investment expenditure as a % of Total Gross Fixed Capital Formationa 36 |
| | Table 3: PAC investment and current expenditure by environmental domain 39 |
| | PART 3 COUNTRY TABLES 43 |
| | - CANADA 44 |
| | - MEXICO 46 |
| | - UNITED STATES 48 |
| | - JAPAN 50 |
| | - KOREA 52 |
| | - AUSTRALIA 55 |
| | - AUSTRIA 58 |
| | - BELGIUM 62 |
| | - CZECH REPUBLIC 67 |
| | - DENMARK 69 |
| | - FINLAND 73 |
| | - FRANCE 77 |
| | - GERMANY 81 |
| | - GREECE 85 |
| | - HUNGARY 88 |
| | - ICELAND 91 |
| | - IRELAND 93 |
| | - ITALY 94 |
| | - LUXEMBOURG 98 |
| | - NETHERLANDS 99 |
| | - NORWAY 103 |
| | - POLAND 105 |
| | - PORTUGAL 108 |
| | - SLOVAK REPUBLIC 111 |
| | - SPAIN 113 |
| | - SWEDEN 116 |
| | - SWITZERLAND 119 |
| | - TURKEY 121 |
| | - UNITED KINGDOM 124 |
| | REFERENCES 127 |