| | REVIEW OF SNOWY PRECIPITATION ENHANCEMENT RESEARCH |
| | 0,52 | | MB | PROJECT ANNUAL REPORT (FEBRUARY 2005) |
| | 47 | | stron |
| | 5045 | | ID | Natural Resources Commission |
| | 2005 | | rok |
| | Table of Contents |
| | 1 Introduction 3 |
| | 1.1 Compliance with legislation and environmental management plan 3 |
| | 1.2 Will cloud seeding increase snowfall in the Snowy Mountains? 3 |
| | 1.3 Will cloud seeding have a significant adverse environmental impact? 4 |
| | 1.4 Recommendations 5 |
| | 1.5 Structure of report 6 |
| | 2 Compliance with legislative obligations 7 |
| | 2.1 Authorisation 7 |
| | 2.2 Compliance 8 |
| | 3 Purpose of the trial 9 |
| | 4 Will cloud seeding increase snowfall in the Snowy Mountains? 10 |
| | 4.1 Randomised cloud seeding technique 10 |
| | 4.2 Chemical marker technique 11 |
| | 4.3 Conclusion 11 |
| | 5 Will cloud seeding have a significant adverse environmental impact? 12 |
| | 5.1 Establishing causal links between cloud seeding and environmental responses 12 |
| | 5.2 Environmental monitoring focuses solely on ecotoxicity potential 14 |
| | 5.3 Ecotoxicity survey is not representative of the target area 16 |
| | 5.4 Ecotoxicity protocols should be refined 18 |
| | 6 On-ground supervision of the trial 20 |
| | 7 Conclusions on impact of operations to date 21 |
| | 7.1 Impact on snow pack depth 21 |
| | 7.2 Impact on ecotoxicity 22 |
| | Attachment 1 List of recommendations and observations 25 |
| | Attachment 2 Review of cloud seeding experimental techniques 27 |
| | Attachment 3 Review of ecotoxicity survey 30 |
| | Attachment 4 Results of ecotoxicity surveys to date 34 |
| | Attachment 5 Warne Report 36 |