Delivering Key Waste Management Infrastructure: Lessons

4,41

MB

Learned from Europe

82

stron

5125

ID

SLR Consulting Limited

2005

rok

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1

1.0 BACKGROUND 1

1.1 Scope and Objectives . 1

1.2 Methodology 2

2.0 COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE REVIEW. 4

3.0 COUNTRY PROFILES 8

3.1 Austria 8

3.1.1 Current Infrastructure Status. 8

3.1.2 Key Features 8

3.1.3 Case Studies. 12

3.2 Denmark. 13

3.2.1 Current Infrastructure Status. 13

3.2.2 Key Features 13

3.2.3 Case Studies. 17

3.3 France. 18

3.3.1 Current Infrastructure Status. 18

3.3.2 Key Features 18

3.3.3 Case Studies. 22

3.4 Germany. 23

3.4.1 Current Infrastructure Status. 23

3.4.2 Key Features 23

3.4.3 Case Studies. 27

3.5 Ireland 28

3.5.1 Current Infrastructure Status. 28

3.5.2 Key Features 28

3.5.3 Case Studies. 32

3.6 Italy 33

3.6.1 Current Infrastructure Status. 33

3.6.2 Key Features 33

3.6.3 Case Studies37

3.7 Netherlands .38

3.7.1 Current Infrastructure Status .38

3.7.2 Key Features.38

3.7.3 Case Studies42

3.8 Spain .43

3.8.1 Current Infrastructure Status .43

3.8.2 Key Features.43

3.8.3 Case Studies46

3.9 Sweden47

3.9.1 Current Infrastructure Status .47

3.9.2 Key Features.47

3.9.3 Case Studies51

3.10 United Kingdom .52

3.10.1 Current Infrastructure Status .52

3.10.2 Key Features.52

3.10.3 Case Studies56

4.0 LANDFILL DIRECTIVE PERFORMANCE .57

5.0 COMMON THEMES ANALYSIS .58

5.1.1 Cultural Themes .58

5.1.2 Planning Themes 59

5.1.3 Policy Themes.60

5.1.4 Financing Themes.61

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED63

APPENDIX I - INTERVIEWEES 65

APPENDIX II - KEY REFERENCE SOURCES67

APPENDIX III - COMPARATIVE DATA.70