| | FEASIBILITY STUDY IN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT, |
| | 1,07 | | MB | UTILIZATION OF BIOGAS PRODUCED IN AN ANAEROBIC DIGESTER |
| | 69 | | stron |
| | 5254 | | ID | University of Strathclyde |
| | 2005 | | rok |
| | Contents |
| | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..III |
| | TABLE OF FIGURES . IV |
| | CONTENTS V |
| | ABSTRACT VI |
| | CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION |
| | 1.1 INTRODUCTION TO ANAEROBIC DIGESTION .8 |
| | 1.2 WHAT IS ANAEROBIC DIGESTION ? .11 |
| | 1.3 DIFFERENT PHASES OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION . .12 |
| | 1.3.1 IMPROVEMENTS TO THE OLD PROCEDURE.12 |
| | 1.3.2 PHASE ISOLATION FOR EFFICIENCY .14 |
| | 1.4 A SHORT HISTORY OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION . 14 |
| | CHAPTER 2 ENERGY AND ANAEROBIC DIGESTION |
| | 2.1 METHANE AND NATURAL GAS . 19 |
| | 2.2 END-USE OF BIOGAS 21 |
| | 2.3 WHY ANAEROBIC DIGESTION (AD) ? 24 |
| | 2.3.1 WASTE TREATMENT BENEFITS . ..24 |
| | 2.3.2 ENERGY BENEFITS .24 |
| | 2.3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS . .24 |
| | 2.3.4 ECONOMIC BENEFITS . .25 |
| | 2.4 DESCRIPTION OF A SUCCESSFUL DIGESTION SYSTEM . .25 |
| | 2.4.1 ECONOMIC ..25 |
| | 2.4.2 DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS .25 |
| | 2.4.3 INDIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS . .26 |
| | 2.4.4 NON-ECONOMIC 27 |
| | 2.5 A BRIEF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 27 |
| | 2.5.1 KYOTO PROTOCOL 28 |
| | 2.5.2 METHANE EMISSION .28 |
| | CHAPTER 3 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR OUR CASE STUDY |
| | 3.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND . .30 |
| | 3.1.1 PURPOSE .30 |
| | 3.1.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA 31 |
| | 3.2 LOCATION . .31 |
| | 3.3 POPULATION DATA .31 |
| | 3.4 METHANE YIELD-ENERGY PRODUCED . 31 |
| | 3.4.1 THE EQUATION TO ESTIMATE BODW .32 |
| | 3.4.2 THE EQUATION TO ESTIMATE BODSL . .33 |
| | 3.4.3 DETERMINATION OF AN EMISSION FACTOR (EF) AND ESTIMATION OF A METHANE |
| | CONVERSION FACTOR (MCF).33 |
| | 3.5 HOW MUCH ENERGY ? . .36 |
| | 3.6 GAS CLEANUP REQUIREMENTS 36 |
| | 3.7 DIGESTER DESIGNS 37 |
| | CHAPTER 4 TECHNOLOGY SURVEY |
| | 4.1 RECIPROCATING ENGINES . 40 |
| | 4.2 FUEL CELLS .41 |
| | 4.3 MICROTURBINES .42 |
| | 4.4 CONCLUSIONS . .43 |
| | CHAPTER 5 LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSES OF SELECTED BIOGAS UTILIZATION OPTION |
| | 5.1 PURPOSE OF LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS . .44 |
| | 5.2 CASE 0:STATUS QUO . .44 |
| | 5.3 CASE 1:H2S REMOVAL 45 |
| | 5.4 CASE 2:MICROTURBINE WITH HEAT RECOVERY . 45 |
| | 5.5 CASE 3:H2S REMOVAL AND MICROTURBINE WITH HEAT RECOVERY .46 |
| | 5.6 LCC ANALYSIS OVERVIEW .47 |
| | 5.7 OPERATION STRATEGIES FOR PROCESS MODELS 48 |
| | 5.8 ECONOMIC INPUTS . 49 |
| | 5.9 EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE & OPERATIONAL DATA .49 |
| | 5.10 BASE CASE 1:INPUT VALUES - H2S REMOVAL 49 |
| | 5.10.1 BASE CASE 1:OUTPUT VALUES-- H2S REMOVAL 51 |
| | 5.11.1 BASE CASE 2B :OUTPUT VALUES . 52 |
| | 5.12 SUMMARY OF BASE CASES . ..53 |
| | CHAPTER 6 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS |
| | 6.1 ESTIMATED EMISSIONS REDUCTION OF SELECTED BIOGAS UTILIZATION OPTIONS .54 |
| | 6.2 POLLUTANT EMISSIONS.54 |
| | 6.3 ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE OF REDUCTION . .55 |
| | 6.4 BASE CASE EMISSIONS . .55 |
| | 6.5 CASE 1:HYDROGEN SUFIDE REMOVAL . .56 |
| | 6.5.1 CASE 1 EMISSIONS .57 |
| | 6.6 CASE 2B:MICROTURBINE WITH HEAT RECOVERY . .58 |
| | 6.6.1 CASE 2B EMISSIONS . .58 |
| | CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSIONS OF OUR FEASIBILITY STUDY |
| | 7.1 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION . .62 |
| | REFERENCES . 65 |
| | APPENDIX A |
| | ABBREVIATIONS -GLOSSARY . .67 |
| | APPENDIX B |
| | TABLES . .68 |
| | BIBLIOGRAPHY . 69 |