| | ON THE CONFLATION OF CONTAMINANT BEHAVIOUR PREDICTION |
| | 2,41 | | MB | WITHIN WHOLE BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION |
| | 175 | | stron |
| | 5262 | | ID | University of Strathclyde |
| | 2006 | | rok |
| | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | Copyright Declaration i |
| | Acknowledgements ii |
| | Dedication iii |
| | Abstract iv |
| | Table of Contents v |
| | Chapter 1 Indoor Air Pollution |
| | 1.0 Introduction 1 |
| | 1.1 Elements of Indoor Contaminant Behaviour 3 |
| | 1.1.1 Transport 5 |
| | 1.1.2 Filtration 5 |
| | 1.1.3 Adsorption/Desorption5 |
| | 1.1.4 Diffusion 6 |
| | 1.1.5 Identity Change 6 |
| | 1.1.6 Emission 6 |
| | 1.1.7 Resuspension 7 |
| | 1.1.8 Deposition 7 |
| | 1.1.9 Radioactive Decay 7 |
| | 1.1.10 Coagulation 8 |
| | 1.1.11 Phase Change 8 |
| | 1.2 Important Air Pollutants 8 |
| | 1.3 List of common Contaminants 9 |
| | 1.3.1 Carbon Dioxide 10 |
| | 1.3.2 Nitrous Oxide 10 |
| | 1.3.3 Carbon monoxide 10 |
| | 1.3.4 Nitrogen dioxide 11 |
| | 1.3.5 Sulphur dioxide 11 |
| | 1.3.6 Ozone 11 |
| | 1.3.7 Radon 11 |
| | 1.3.8 Methane 12 |
| | 1.3.9 Benzene 12 |
| | 1.3.10 1,3butadiene |
| | 1.3.11 Formaldehyde 12 |
| | 1.3.12 Lead12 |
| | 1.3.13 Particulate Matter 12 |
| | 1.4 Importance of studying Indoor Air Pollutants 13 |
| | 1.4.1 Health Problems 14 |
| | 1.4.2 Productivity Problems 15 |
| | 1.4.3 Comfort and Odour Problems 17 |
| | 1.4.4 World Health Organisation Recommendation17 |
| | 1.5 Summary 18 |
| | 1.6 References 19 |
| | Chapter 2 Building Simulation |
| | 2.1 Recent Historical Review 25 |
| | 2.1.1Early Building Performance Prediction Tools 25 |
| | 2.1.2 Building Simulation 25 |
| | 2.1.3 The Heat Balance Approach 26 |
| | 2.1.4 Plant and Airflow Modelling 27 |
| | 2.1.5 Further Advances in Building Modelling 27 |
| | 2.1.6 Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) 28 |
| | 2.2 User Perspective 29 |
| | 2.3 Integrated Contaminant Simulation 29 |
| | 2.3.1 Domain Integration 30 |
| | 2.3.2 Domain Integration for Contaminant Modelling 31 |
| | 2.3.3 Domain Integration within ESPr 33 |
| | 2.4Integration within Thermally Conflated Mass Flow and CFD domains 35 |
| | 2.5 Research Objectives 42 |
| | 2.6 References 43 |
| | Chapter 3 Modelling and Implementation |
| | 3.1 Mathematical Analysis 48 |
| | 3.1.1 Matrix Implementation 50 |
| | 3.1.2 Weighting of present and future time row values 50 |
| | 3.1.3 Airflow mass matrix K 50 |
| | 3.1.4 Calculation of Contaminant Concentration 53 |
| | 3.1.5 Solution Procedure 54 |
| | 3.2 Assumptions built into the Mathematical Model 54 |
| | 3.3 Capabilities of the Contaminant Model 55 |
| | 3.3.1 Source and Sink Algorithms 56 |
| | 3.3.1.1 Constant Coefficient Source 57 |
| | 3.3.1.2 Cutoff Concentration Source 57 |
| | 3.3.1.3 Exponential Decay and Generation 57 |
| | 3.3.1.4 Boundary Layer Diffusion Model 57 |
| | 3.3.1.5 Time Dependant Constant Mass 58 |
| | 3.3.1.6 Personal Carbon dioxide Emission 58 |
| | 3.3.2 Source and Sink Linkages with Contaminants and Nodes 59 |
| | 3.3.3 Filter Efficiencies 59 |
| | 3.3.4 First Order Chemical Reactions 59 |
| | 3.3.5 Temporally varying Ambient Concentrations 60 |
| | 3.4 Information Handling 60 |
| | 3.4.1 Contaminants Definition File (*.ctm) 60 |
| | 3.4.2 Information I/O 61 |
| | 3.5 Choosing a Suitable Time Step 61 |
| | 3.6 Contaminant Based Control 63 |
| | 3.7 Summary 64 |
| | 3.8 References 64 |
| | Chapter 4 Validation |
| | 4.1 Validation Standard 70 |
| | 4.2 Summary of Validation Models 71 |
| | 4.3 Analytical Validation 72 |
| | 4.3.1 Test 1 72 |
| | 4.3.2 Test 2 74 |
| | 4.3.3 Test 3 76 |
| | 4.4 Inter program comparisons 77 |
| | 4.4.1 Test 4 77 |
| | 4.5 Empirical Validation 81 |
| | 4.5.1 Model Detail 81 |
| | 4.5.2 Simulation 82 |
| | 4.5.3 Results 82 |
| | 4.6 References 85 |
| | Chapter 5 Integrating Network Flow Modelling and CFD |
| | 5.0 Introduction 87 |
| | 5.1 Conflation of mfs and dfs 88 |
| | 5.2 Known Pressure Node Type Conflation (Type A) 90 |
| | 5.3 Pressure Difference Feedback Type Conflation (Type D) 93 |
| | 5.4 Unknown Pressure Node Type Conflation (Type B) 97 |
| | 5.5 Pressure Feedback Type Conflation (Type C) 99 |
| | 5.6 Contaminant Prediction Integration 102 |
| | 5.7 Validation 103 |
| | 5.8 Summary 109 |
| | 5.9 References 110 |
| | Chapter 6 Case Studies |
| | 6.0 Introduction 111 |
| | 6.1 Public House in England (IAQ vs Energy) 111 |
| | 6.1.1 Model Description and Operating Conditions 111 |
| | 6.1.2 Ventilation Flow Variations investigated 115 |
| | 6.1.3 Results Analysis 115 |
| | 6.2 Manager's Office (CO2 Based Control) 118 |
| | 6.2.1 Introduction 118 |
| | 6.2.2 Model Detail 118 |
| | 6.2.3 Simulation and Results 120 |
| | 6.3 Balance of Energy Requirement and Good IAQ by using CO2 Control 123 |
| | 6.4 Canadian Conference Building with Atrium 124 |
| | 6.4.1 Model Detail 124 |
| | 6.4.2 Findings from Detailed Fluid Flow (CFD) Analysis126 |
| | 6.5 Summary 129 |
| | 6.6 References 129 |
| | Chapter 7 Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Work |
| | 7.1 Conclusions 131 |
| | 7.2 Recommendations for Future Work 134 |
| | 7.2.1 Theoretical Improvements for Particulate Modelling 134 |
| | 7.2.2 Transport Delays 134 |
| | 7.2.3 Contaminant and Related Information Procurement134 |
| | 7.2.4 Filter Efficiencies 135 |
| | 7.2.5 Temporal Definition of Ambient Concentration 135 |
| | 7.2.6 Occupant Exposure 135 |
| | 7.2.7 Solution Optimisation 135 |
| | 7.2.8 CFD Solution Process 136 |
| | 7.3 References 136 |
| | Appendices and Glossary |
| | AS1 Analytical Solution to Project Model Test1 137 |
| | AS2 Analytical Solution to Project Model Test2 139 |
| | AS3 Error Estimate for Project Model Test3 141 |
| | ATR CFD results from Canadian Conference Building 143 |
| | CAS Comparison of COMIS and ESPr with empirical 147 |
| | CCS Comparison of Conflated and Standalone CFD 150 |
| | CTM Sample ESPr Contaminants Network File 154 |