| | CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH MINING |
| | 1,88 | | MB | WASTES IN KYRGYZSTAN |
| | 100 | | stron |
| | 5949 | | ID | Central European University |
| | 2003 | | rok |
| | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | 1. INTRODUCTION . 2 |
| | 1.1. SCOPE OF THE THESIS 4 |
| | 2. METHODOLOGY 6 |
| | 3. INFORMATION ABOUT THE MINING INDUSTRY IN KYRGYZSTAN. 9 |
| | 3.1. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT KYRGYZSTAN . 9 |
| | 3.2. THE MINING INDUSTRY IN KYRGYZSTAN. 12 |
| | 3.2.1. Mining and economics . 14 |
| | 3.3. ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION IN KYRGYZSTAN 15 |
| | 4. MINING ACTIVITY AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS INKYRGYZSTAN 18 |
| | 4.1. ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS RELATED TO MINING IN GENERAL . 18 |
| | 4.1.1. Land erosion 20 |
| | 4.1.2. Air pollution 20 |
| | 4.1.3. Water pollution . 20 |
| | 4.2. HARD-ROCK MINING WASTES IN KYRGYZSTAN . 21 |
| | 4.2.1. Health risks associated with heavy metals. 34 |
| | 4.2.2. Specific risks of uranium mining wastes. 36 |
| | 4.2.3. Occurrence and toxicity of selected pollutants from the mining industry40 |
| | 4.3. CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARDS INFLUENCING MINING WASTES. 45 |
| | 4.3.1. Anthropogenic hazards 46 |
| | 4.3.2. Natural hazards 47 |
| | 4.4. ACCIDENTS INVOLVING TAILINGS IN THE MINING INDUSTRY . 52 |
| | 4.4.1. Accidents world-wide . 52 |
| | 4.4.2. Accidents in Kyrgyzstan . 54 |
| | 5. RANKING THE MINING SITES ACCORDING TO RISK LEVELS . 56 |
| | 5.1. INFORMATION FROM SEC GEOPRIBOR . 57 |
| | 5.2. INFORMATION FROM MEP AND MES 59 |
| | 5.3. INFORMATION FROM NEAP . 60 |
| | 5.4. RANKING RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC HAZARDS. 64 |
| | 5.4.1. Anthropogenic risks 64 |
| | 5.4.2. Geologic hazards . 68 |
| | 5.4.3. Cumulative levels of risk associated with natural and anthropogenic hazards 76 |
| | 5.5. RISK LEVELS AND PRIORITY OF MINING SITES IN KYRGYZSTAN. 77 |
| | 6. POLITICAL RISKS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCIDENTS AT MINING HOTSPOTS . 80 |
| | 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . 83 |
| | 8. LIST OF REFERENCES 87 |
| | APPENDICES |