| | Simplicity and Spook: Terrorism and the Dynamics of Threat |
| | 0,22 | | MB | Exaggeration |
| | 27 | | stron |
| | 6284 | | ID | Ohio State University |
| | 2005 | | rok |
| | It has been common, at least since 1945, to exaggerate and to overreact to foreign threats, |
| | something that seems to be continuing with current concerns over international terrorism. This paper |
| | sketches threat exaggeration during the Cold War and applies the experience from that era to the |
| | current one. Alarmism and overreaction can be harmful, particularly economically. And, in the case |
| | of terrorism, it can help create the damaging consequences the terrorists seek but are unable to |
| | perpetrate on their own. Moreover, many of the forms alarmism has taken verge on hysteria. The |
| | United States is hardly ‘‘vulnerable’’ in the sense that it can be toppled by dramatic acts of terrorist |
| | destruction, even extreme ones. The country can, however grimly, readily absorb that kind of |
| | damage, and it has outlasted considerably more potent threats in the past. |
| | Keywords: terrorism, threat perception, weapons of mass destruction |