| | The DNAPL Remediation Challenge: Is There a Case for Source |
| | 1,09 | | MB | Depletion? |
| | 129 | | stron |
| | 6489 | | ID | UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY |
| | 2004 | | rok |
| | Contents |
| | Notice ii |
| | Foreword iii |
| | Acknowledgments . ix |
| | Executive Summary . x |
| | 1.0 Introduction 1 |
| | 1.1 Background .1 |
| | 1.2 Expert Panel Formation .2 |
| | 1.3 Organization of the Report 3 |
| | 2.0 Problem Description .5 |
| | 2.1 DNAPLs as a Source of Groundwater Contamination .5 |
| | 2.2 Magnitude of the Problem .5 |
| | 2.3 Regulatory Framework 6 |
| | 2.4 Technical Framework 7 |
| | 3.0 Questions .11 |
| | 3.1 Question 1: What are the Potential Benefi ts and Potential Adverse Impacts of DNAPL Source |
| | Depletion as a Remediation Strategy? 11 |
| | 3.1.1 Potential Benefi ts of Partial Source Depletion 11 |
| | 3.1.2 Potential Adverse Impacts from Use of Aggressive Technologies for Source Depletion 14 |
| | 3.1.3 Summary 15 |
| | 3.2 Question 2: What are the Appropriate Performance Metrics for Assessment of DNAPL Source |
| | Depletion Technologies? 16 |
| | 3.2.1 Type I Metrics 16 |
| | 3.2.2 Type II Metrics .17 |
| | 3.2.3 Type III Metrics 18 |
| | 3.2.4 Summary 18 |
| | 3.3 Question 3: Are Available Technologies Adequate for DNAPL Source Characterization to Select |
| | and Evaluate Depletion Options? 18 |
| | 3.3.1 Innovations in Site Characterization Approaches .19 |
| | 3.3.2 Innovations in Site Characterization Tools 19 |
| | 3.3.3 Summary 23 |
| | 3.4 Question 4: What Performance can be Anticipated from DNAPL Source-Zone Depletion |
| | Technologies? 23 |
| | 3.4.1 Status of Development and Deployment of DNAPL Source-Zone Depletion Technologies .24 |
| | 3.4.2 Anticipated Effectiveness of DNAPL Source-Zone Depletion Technologies .29 |
| | 3.4.3 Cost of DNAPL Source Depletion Technologies .31 |
| | 3.4.4 Summary 32 |
| | 3.5 Question 5: Are Currently Available Tools Adequate to Predict the Performance of Source |
| | Depletion Options? 32 |
| | 3.5.1 Numerical Models: Deterministic Approaches 32 |
| | 3.5.2 Numerical/Analytical Models: Stochastic Approaches 33 |
| | 3.5.3 Guidance Documents .34 |
| | 3.5.4 Case Studies and Pilot Tests 34 |
| | 3.5.5 Limitations of Existing Tools 35 |
| | 3.5.6 Summary 36 |
| | 3.6 Question 6: What are the Factors Limiting the Effective and Appropriate Application of Source |
| | Depletion Technologies? 36 |
| | 3.6.1 Defi nition of Remedial Objectives Requiring Restoration in Source Zones .36 |
| | 3.6.2 Uncertainty in Predicting Likelihood of Success at a Given Cost 36 |
| | 3.6.3 Lack of Well-Documented Successes 37 |
| | 3.6.4 Availability and Cost of Insurance .37 |
| | 3.6.5 Limited Number of Qualifi ed Vendors .37 |
| | 3.7 Question 7: How Should Decisions be Made Whether to Undertake DNAPL Source Depletion? 38 |
| | |
| | 4.0 Knowledge Gaps and Research Needs 41 |
| | 4.1 Introduction .41 |
| | 4.2 Performance Metrics 41 |
| | 4.2.1 Knowledge Gaps .41 |
| | 4.2.2 Research Needs 41 |
| | 4.3 Site Characterization .41 |
| | 4.3.1 Knowledge Gaps .41 |
| | 4.3.2 Research Needs .41 |
| | 4.4 DNAPL Source-Zone Depletion Technologies .42 |
| | 4.4.1 Knowledge Gaps .42 |
| | 4.4.2 Research Needs .42 |
| | 4.5 Performance Prediction Tools 42 |
| | 4.5.1 Knowledge Gaps .42 |
| | 4.5.2 Research Needs .43 |
| | 4.6 Decision Analysis Tools .43 |
| | 4.6.1 Knowledge Gaps .43 |
| | 4.6.2 Research Needs .43 |
| | 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations .45 |
| | 5.1 Conclusions .45 |
| | 5.2 Recommendations .47 |
| | 6.0 List of References and Bibliography 49 |
| | Appendices |
| | A Case Studies .59 |
| | B Biosketches of Panel Members .97 |
| | C Workshop Agenda – Dallas, TX .104 |
| | D List of Attendees – Dallas, TX .107 |