| | In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Ethene DNAPL Source |
| | 3,17 | | MB | Zones: Case Studies |
| | 173 | | stron |
| | 6492 | | ID | Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council |
| | 2007 | | rok |
| | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. i |
| | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . iii |
| | 1. INTRODUCTION .1 |
| | 1.1 Background1 |
| | 1.2 Overview2 |
| | 1.3 Synopsis of the Case Studies 3 |
| | 1.4 Structure of this Document .5 |
| | 1.5 Companion CD .6 |
| | 1.6 References6 |
| | 2. TEST AREA NORTH SITE AT IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY CASE STUDY SUMMARY.7 |
| | 2.1 Scale and Purpose .7 |
| | 2.2 Site Conceptual Model9 |
| | 2.3 Remediation Goals10 |
| | 2.4 Bioremediation Performance Monitoring .12 |
| | 2.5 Results15 |
| | 2.6 Summary .18 |
| | 2.7 References21 |
| | 2.8 Reviewer Comments.23 |
| | 3. PILOT-SCALE EVALUATION USING BIOAUGMENTATION TO ENHANCE PCE DISSOLUTION |
| | AT DOVER AFB NATIONAL TEST SITE CASE STUDY SUMMARY29 |
| | 3.1 Project Scale and Purpose.29 |
| | 3.2 Site Conceptual Model30 |
| | 3.3 Remediation Goals35 |
| | 3.4 Bioremediation Performance Monitoring .36 |
| | 3.5 Effect on the Source Area .37 |
| | 3.6 Summary .40 |
| | 3.7 Available Resources41 |
| | 3.8 References41 |
| | 3.9 Reviewer Comments.41 |
| | 4. LAUNCH COMPLEX 34 AT CAPE CANAVERAL CASE STUDY SUMMARY .49 |
| | 4.1 Project Scale and Purpose.49 |
| | 4.2 Site Conceptual Model50 |
| | 4.3 Remediation Goals50 |
| | 4.4 Bioremediation System Construction and Operation .51 |
| | 4.5 Bioremediation Performance Monitoring .52 |
| | 4.6 Effect on the Source Area .53 |
| | 4.7 Cost Information .54 |
| | 4.8 Summary .54 |
| | 4.9 References54 |
| | 4.10 Reviewer Comments.55 |
| | 5. DEMONSTRATION OF ENHANCED BIOREMEDIATION IN A TCE SOURCE AREA CASE |
| | STUDY SUMMARY .61 |
| | 5.1 Project Scope and Purpose61 |
| | 5.2 DNAPL Source Zone Treatment Strategy 62 |
| | 5.3 Bioremediation System Construction and Operation .65 |
| | 5.4 Effects on the Source Area .67 |
| | 5.5 Cost Information .70 |
| | 5.6 Summary .70 |
| | 5.7 Additional Resources and References 75 |
| | 5.8 Reviewer Comments.75 |
| | 6. SOURCE AREA REMEDIATION AT A PORTLAND, OREGON DRY CLEANER SITE CASE |
| | STUDY SUMMARY79 |
| | 6.1 Project Scale and Purpose.80 |
| | 6.2 Site Conceptual Model80 |
| | 6.3 Remediation Goals81 |
| | 6.4 Bioremediation System Construction and Operation .82 |
| | 6.5 Bioremediation Performance Monitoring .82 |
| | 6.6 Technology Cost .87 |
| | 6.7 Observations and Lessons Learned.88 |
| | 6.8 Reviewer Comments.89 |
| | 7. ENHANCED ANAEROBIC BIOREMEDIATION OF A TCE SOURCE AT THE TARHEEL ARMY |
| | MISSILE PLANT USING EOS CASE STUDY SUMMARY.98 |
| | 7.1 Introduction98 |
| | 7.2 Site Conceptual Model99 |
| | 7.3 Remediation Goals102 |
| | 7.4 Bioremediation System Construction and Operation .103 |
| | 7.5 Bioremediation Performance Monitoring .104 |
| | 7.6 Effect on Source Area.105 |
| | 7.7 Summary .112 |
| | 7.8 Future Activities112 |
| | 7.9 Available Resources and References 113 |
| | 7.10 Reviewer Comments.115 |
| | 8. SUMMARY122 |
| | 8.1 Credible Evidence for ISB of Sources 122 |
| | 8.2 Major Issues 123 |
| | 8.3 Lessons Learned125 |
| | 8.4 Application Guidance .126 |
| | 9. SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF SUBSURFACE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: |
| | INVESTIGATIONS, REMEDIAL DESIGN, AND LONG-TERM MONITORING OF BIONAPL |
| | REMEDIATION SYSTEMS128 |
| | 9.1 Bioremediation Physics Models .129 |
| | 9.2 Subsurface Modeling and Design Optimization .129 |
| | 9.3 Modeling Tools.130 |
| | 9.4 Modeling Approach 134 |
| | 9.5 Limitations and Uncertainties .136 |
| | 9.6 Examples of Bioremediation/DNAPL Modeling Presentation.137 |
| | 9.7 Value Engineering 141 |
| | 9.8 Life-Cycle Cost Function142 |
| | 9.9 Pseudo-Code for the Sitewide Optimizer .142 |
| | 9.10 Summary and Conclusions .144 |
| | 9.11 Acknowledgments.145 |
| | 9.12 References.145 |